Literature DB >> 17582674

Serum cytokines as biomarkers for nonsurgical prediction of endometriosis.

Essam El-Din R Othman1, Daniela Hornung, Hosam T Salem, Essam A Khalifa, Tarek H El-Metwally, Ayman Al-Hendy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the ability of a group of serum cytokines, either individually or in combination, to serve as biomarkers for the nonsurgical diagnosis of endometriosis. STUDY
DESIGN: Subjects were allocated to two groups according to their laparoscopic diagnosis. The first group consisted of patients with endometriosis and the second group was made up of infertile women with no pelvic pathology (controls). Blood samples were collected preoperatively and stored. Cytokines were measured in the serum of all participants using the Bio-Plex Protein Array System. Nonparametric statistics and the Mann-Whitney test were used to compare groups. Subjects were seen at the Gynecologic endoscopy unit.
RESULTS: Three cytokines were significantly higher in the serum of subjects with endometriosis than in the control group: interleukin-6 (IL-6) [4.41 pg/ml (range: 1.47-15.01) versus 0.97 pg/ml (range: 0.29-2.98), respectively; p<0.001], monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) [37.91 pg/ml (range: 24.54-94.74) versus 22.13 pg/ml (range: 13.85-39.45), respectively; p<0.001], and interferon-gamma (INF-gamma) [19.01 pg/ml (range: 1.19-73.52) versus 0.30 pg/ml (range: 0.00-13.05), respectively; p<0.001]. There was no statistically significant difference between subjects with endometriosis and controls in the serum concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), or granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Interleukin-2 (IL-2), interleukin-8 (IL-8), and interleukin-15 (IL-15) were undetectable in the serum of both groups. None of the measured cytokines showed significant correlation with the cycle phase or stage of endometriosis. In a multivariate analysis, serum interleukin-6 provided a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 66% to discriminate between endometriosis patients and controls at a cutoff point of 1.9 pg/ml. Adding monocyte chemotactic protein-1 and interferon-gamma to interleukin-6 did not increase the discriminative ability over that achieved by measuring serum interleukin-6 alone.
CONCLUSIONS: Serum of subjects with endometriosis contains significantly higher levels of interleukin-6, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, and interferon-gamma than control women. Serum interleukin-6 measurements discriminate between women with endometriosis and controls. Interleukin-6 provides a promising serum marker for the nonsurgical prediction of endometriosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17582674     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  28 in total

Review 1.  Peripheral biomarkers of endometriosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  K E May; S A Conduit-Hulbert; J Villar; S Kirtley; S H Kennedy; C M Becker
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 15.610

2.  An Analysis of ESR2 and CYP19A1 Gene Expression Levels in Women With Endometriosis.

Authors:  Tomasz Szaflik; Beata Smolarz; Beata Mroczkowska; Bartosz Kulig; Malwina Soja; Hanna Romanowicz; Magdalena BryŚ; Ewa Forma; Krzysztof SzyŁŁo
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Systemic Iron Deficiency in a Nonhuman Primate Model of Endometriosis.

Authors:  Hannah M Atkins; Susan E Appt; Robert N Taylor; Yaritbel Torres-Mendoza; Emily E Lenk; Nancy S Rosenthal; David L Caudell
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 0.982

Review 4.  Endometrial receptivity in the eutopic endometrium of women with endometriosis: it is affected, and let me show you why.

Authors:  Bruce A Lessey; J Julie Kim
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Immune interactions in endometriosis.

Authors:  Jennifer L Herington; Kaylon L Bruner-Tran; John A Lucas; Kevin G Osteen
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Immunol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.473

Review 6.  Blood biomarkers for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.

Authors:  Vicki Nisenblat; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Rabia Shaikh; Cindy Farquhar; Vanessa Jordan; Carola S Scheffers; Ben Willem J Mol; Neil Johnson; M Louise Hull
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-05-01

7.  Alternative activation of macrophages in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) with endometriosis.

Authors:  Kumari A Smith; Christine B Pearson; Audra M Hachey; Dong-Ling Xia; Lynn M Wachtman
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 0.982

8.  A Prospective Study of Inflammatory Markers and Risk of Endometriosis.

Authors:  Fan Mu; Holly R Harris; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Susan E Hankinson; Eric B Rimm; Donna Spiegelman; Stacey A Missmer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Prospective assessment of midsecretory endometrial leukemia inhibitor factor expression versus ανβ3 testing in women with unexplained infertility.

Authors:  Jason M Franasiak; Kristin J Holoch; Lingwen Yuan; David P Schammel; Steven L Young; Bruce A Lessey
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Circulating and peritoneal fluid interleukin-6 levels and gene expression in pelvic endometriosis.

Authors:  Vânia Teixeira De Andrade; Andréa Prestes Nácul; Betânia Rodrigues Dos Santos; Sheila Bünecker Lecke; Poli Mara Spritzer; Débora Martinho Morsch
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.