Literature DB >> 17576901

Life after total laryngectomy: a measure of long-term survival, function, and quality of life.

Troy D Woodard1, Agnes Oplatek, Guy J Petruzzelli.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyze postoperative clinical, functional, and quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes in patients after total laryngectomy (TL) and to determine the effect of preoperative variables (including age, sex, comorbidities, prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy, and tumor site and stage) on long-term survival and quality of life.
DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort follow-up study of patients who underwent TL for cancer between July 28, 1994, and August 11, 2005.
SETTING: University tertiary care facility. PATIENTS: One hundred forty-three patients who underwent TL were identified, and their hospital medical records were reviewed. Ninety-one patients (63.6%) underwent TL for primary carcinoma and 52 (36.4%) for recurrent cancer. At follow-up, 58 patients (40.6%) were alive. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Baseline characteristics and preoperative clinical variables were collected. Follow-up data on function and QOL were collected from patients who were alive at the time of study via the Head and Neck Cancer Inventory, a previously validated questionnaire. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analysis was used to determine factors significant for survival.
RESULTS: The overall median survival for the cohort was 23.0 months (mean +/- SD, 50 +/- 29 months). On univariate analysis, the following 5 factors were significant predictors of long-term survival: cancer site in the larynx, T3 stage, N0 to N1 stage, presence of no more than 2 comorbidities, and absence of cardiovascular comorbidities at the time of cancer diagnosis (P<.05). On multivariate analysis, only T stage maintained significance as a predictor of survival (P =.04), while cancer site was nonsignificant at P =.07. For patients alive at the time of study, functional and QOL outcomes for 5 domains (speech, eating, social disruption, aesthetics, and overall QOL) ranged from intermediate (score, 31-69) to high (score, 70-100) categories. Pretreatment patient-related factors that correlated with notably better functional and QOL outcomes in at least 1 domain were age older than 65 years at diagnosis, presence of no more than 2 comorbidities, no history of previous chemoradiation therapy, and primary tracheoesophageal puncture placement.
CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment clinical variables (including primary tumor site, tumor stage, regional metastases, and number and type of comorbidities) have an effect on long-term survival after TL. Despite common belief, many patients who have undergone TL maintain a good QOL overall. This study sheds light on which patient-related factors may affect health-related QOL outcomes after TL. These findings may be used to select patients who are good candidates for TL based on anticipated functional and QOL outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17576901     DOI: 10.1001/archotol.133.6.526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0886-4470


  14 in total

1.  Pretreatment health behaviors predict survival among patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Sonia A Duffy; David L Ronis; Scott McLean; Karen E Fowler; Stephen B Gruber; Gregory T Wolf; Jeffrey E Terrell
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Evaluation of the revised TNM classification in advanced laryngeal cancer.

Authors:  G Psychogios; F Waldfahrer; A Bozzato; H Iro
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  The national landscape of unplanned 30-day readmissions after total laryngectomy.

Authors:  Rocco Ferrandino; Jonathan Garneau; Scott Roof; Caitlin Pacheco; Priti Poojary; Aparna Saha; Kinsuk Chauhan; Brett Miles
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Patterns of oral and dental care education and utilization in head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Joel B Epstein; Derek K Smith; Dana Villines; Ira Parker; Jeff Hameroff; Brian R Hill; Barbara A Murphy
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Quality of life in head and neck cancers patients: predictive factors, functional and psychosocial outcome.

Authors:  E Babin; E Sigston; M Hitier; D Dehesdin; J P Marie; O Choussy
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Closure of post-laryngectomy pharyngocutaneous fistulae.

Authors:  Isaac A Bohannon; William R Carroll; J Scott Magnuson; Eben L Rosenthal
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2011-05-26

7.  Speech and swallow rehabilitation in head and neck cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines.

Authors:  P Clarke; K Radford; M Coffey; M Stewart
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.469

8.  Socioeconomic and Other Demographic Disparities Predicting Survival among Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Seung Hee Choi; Jeffrey E Terrell; Karen E Fowler; Scott A McLean; Tamer Ghanem; Gregory T Wolf; Carol R Bradford; Jeremy Taylor; Sonia A Duffy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts survival in patients with laryngeal cancer.

Authors:  Jintao Du; Jifeng Liu; Xinyuan Zhang; Xiaoting Chen; Rong Yu; Deying Gu; Jian Zou; Yafeng Liu; Shixi Liu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Analysis of Postsurgical Health-Related Quality of Life and Quality of Voice of Patients With Laryngeal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jie Luo; Jieli Wu; Kexing Lv; Kaichun Li; Jianhui Wu; Yihui Wen; Xiaoling Li; Haocheng Tang; Aiyun Jiang; Zhangfeng Wang; Weiping Wen; Wenbin Lei
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.