OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patient-physician communication in obstetrics and gynaecology can be improved by a training program and to investigate if physicians with poorer performance before the training show greater improvement in communication skills scores over the course of the study. DESIGN: Intervention study with randomisation in training (n = 16) and control group (n = 16) and patient satisfaction and communication skills of physicians as outcome variables. Physicians' communication skills were assessed by independent raters using a standardised evaluation instrument (adapted version of the MAAS-R) to analyse video recorded interviews before and after the training. Patient satisfaction was assessed with a patient satisfaction questionnaire. RESULTS: Using general linear model (GLM) for repeated measures no group x time interaction nor time effects were found for physicians' communication skills. No group x time interaction was found for patients' satisfaction scores; however the significant time effect was mostly attributable to positive changes in patients' rating of the training group. Physicians with poorer performance at the beginning showed greater improvements over the course of the study, especially in the training group. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized controlled trial marginal intervention effects for the improvement of communication skills and only partial changes in patient satisfaction scores from pre to post training were shown. However, physicians with poorer performance at the beginning showed greater improvements, suggesting that competence levels were already relatively high at the beginning of the study. Also, formation of communication training groups should be based on specific skill deficits rather than being implemented unspecifically for an entire team of physicians.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patient-physician communication in obstetrics and gynaecology can be improved by a training program and to investigate if physicians with poorer performance before the training show greater improvement in communication skills scores over the course of the study. DESIGN: Intervention study with randomisation in training (n = 16) and control group (n = 16) and patient satisfaction and communication skills of physicians as outcome variables. Physicians' communication skills were assessed by independent raters using a standardised evaluation instrument (adapted version of the MAAS-R) to analyse video recorded interviews before and after the training. Patient satisfaction was assessed with a patient satisfaction questionnaire. RESULTS: Using general linear model (GLM) for repeated measures no group x time interaction nor time effects were found for physicians' communication skills. No group x time interaction was found for patients' satisfaction scores; however the significant time effect was mostly attributable to positive changes in patients' rating of the training group. Physicians with poorer performance at the beginning showed greater improvements over the course of the study, especially in the training group. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized controlled trial marginal intervention effects for the improvement of communication skills and only partial changes in patient satisfaction scores from pre to post training were shown. However, physicians with poorer performance at the beginning showed greater improvements, suggesting that competence levels were already relatively high at the beginning of the study. Also, formation of communication training groups should be based on specific skill deficits rather than being implemented unspecifically for an entire team of physicians.
Authors: Marie C Haverfield; Aaron Tierney; Rachel Schwartz; Michelle B Bass; Cati Brown-Johnson; Dani L Zionts; Nadia Safaeinili; Meredith Fischer; Jonathan G Shaw; Sonoo Thadaney; Gabriella Piccininni; Karl A Lorenz; Steven M Asch; Abraham Verghese; Donna M Zulman Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-01-09 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Louise Forsetlund; Mary Ann O'Brien; Lisa Forsén; Liv Merete Reinar; Mbah P Okwen; Tanya Horsley; Christopher J Rose Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-09-15
Authors: Louise Forsetlund; Arild Bjørndal; Arash Rashidian; Gro Jamtvedt; Mary Ann O'Brien; Fredric Wolf; Dave Davis; Jan Odgaard-Jensen; Andrew D Oxman Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2009-04-15
Authors: Tamara Seitz; Lucia Ucsnik; Andrea Kottmel; Johannes Bitzer; Bela Teleky; Henriette Löffler-Stastka Journal: Arch Womens Ment Health Date: 2020-01-02 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Sonia Lippke; Christina Derksen; Franziska Maria Keller; Lukas Kötting; Martina Schmiedhofer; Annalena Welp Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-05 Impact factor: 3.390