Literature DB >> 17576554

Compressive osseointegration promotes viable bone at the endoprosthetic interface: retrieval study of Compress implants.

M J Kramer1, B J Tanner, A E Horvai, R J O'Donnell.   

Abstract

The Compress implant (Biomet, Warsaw, IN) is an innovative device developed to enable massive endoprosthetic fixation through the application of compressive forces at the bone-implant interface. This design provides immediate, stable anchorage and helps to avoid the long-term complication of aseptic loosening secondary to stress shielding and particle-induced osteolysis seen in conventional, stemmed megaprostheses. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the in vivo biological effects of the high compressive forces attained. Twelve consecutive Compress patients undergoing revision surgery for infection, periprosthetic fracture, or local tumour recurrence were reviewed in order to exclude the possibility of osteonecrosis at the prosthetic interface. Compressive forces ranged from 400-800 lb. Duration of implantation averaged 3.3 years (range 0.4-12.2 years). Two patients with infection demonstrated loosening at the bone-prosthetic interface; otherwise, there was no radiographic evidence of prosthetic failure in any of the patients. No patient demonstrated histological evidence of osteonecrosis. In fact, new woven bone and other findings consistent with viable bone were noted in all of the retrieved specimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17576554      PMCID: PMC2551719          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-007-0392-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  11 in total

1.  Bone deformation recorded in vivo from strain gauges attached to the human tibial shaft.

Authors:  L E Lanyon; W G Hampson; A E Goodship; J S Shah
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1975-05

2.  Proposal for the regulatory mechanism of Wolff's law.

Authors:  M G Mullender; R Huiskes
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 3.  Wear and osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Douglas D R Naudie; Deborah J Ammeen; Gerard A Engh; Cecil H Rorabeck
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  In vitro testing of a novel limb salvage prosthesis for the distal femur.

Authors:  Luca Cristofolini; Stefano Bini; Aldo Toni
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 5.  Review article. The mechanical properties of cortical bone.

Authors:  D T Reilly; A H Burstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 6.  Internal plate fixation of fractures: short history and recent developments.

Authors:  Hans K Uhthoff; Philippe Poitras; David S Backman
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.601

Review 7.  Complications in primary total hip arthroplasty: avoidance and management: wear.

Authors:  Michael D Ries
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2003

8.  Effect of chemotherapy on initial compressive osseointegration of tumor endoprostheses.

Authors:  R S Avedian; R E Goldsby; M J Kramer; R J O'Donnell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Compliant prestress fixation in tumor prostheses: interface retrieval data.

Authors:  S A Bini; J O Johnston; D L Martin
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.390

10.  A custom distal femoral prosthesis for reconstruction of large defects following wide excision for sarcoma: results and prognostic factors.

Authors:  G F Muschler; K Ihara; J M Lane; J H Healey; M J Levine; J C Otis; A H Burstein
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  28 in total

1.  Early equivalence of uncemented press-fit and Compress femoral fixation.

Authors:  German L Farfalli; Patrick J Boland; Carol D Morris; Edward A Athanasian; John H Healey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  How Often Does Spindle Failure Occur in Compressive Osseointegration Endoprostheses for Oncologic Reconstruction?

Authors:  Lauren H Goldman; Lee J Morse; Richard J O'Donnell; Rosanna L Wustrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  What Factors Are Associated With Failure of Compressive Osseointegration Fixation?

Authors:  Ryland Kagan; Jacob Adams; Caroline Schulman; Rachel Laursen; Karina Espana; Jung Yoo; Yee-Cheen Doung; James Hayden
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Compressive osseointegration into a custom acetabular implant masquerading as tumor recurrence: a case report.

Authors:  Adam J Schwartz; Christopher P Beauchamp
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Antirotation pins improve stability of the compress limb salvage implant: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Raffi S Avedian; Timothy Chen; Derek Lindsey; Ariel Palanca; David Mohler
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Chemotherapy Curtails Bone Formation From Compliant Compression Fixation of Distal Femoral Endoprostheses.

Authors:  Mohammad A Elalfy; Patrick J Boland; John H Healey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  The multidisciplinary management of osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Noah Federman; Nicholas Bernthal; Fritz C Eilber; William D Tap
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2009-02-24

8.  Compress periprosthetic fractures: interface stability and ease of revision.

Authors:  Wakenda K Tyler; John H Healey; Carol D Morris; Patrick J Boland; Richard J O'Donnell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Compressive osseointegration of tibial implants in primary cancer reconstruction.

Authors:  Richard J O'Donnell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Cemented distal femoral endoprostheses for musculoskeletal tumor: improved survival of modular versus custom implants.

Authors:  Adam J Schwartz; J Michael Kabo; Fritz C Eilber; Frederick R Eilber; Jeffrey J Eckardt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.