Literature DB >> 10917246

Compliant prestress fixation in tumor prostheses: interface retrieval data.

S A Bini1, J O Johnston, D L Martin.   

Abstract

This article reports the first available human retrieval data following the use of a new fixation system for tumor prostheses. The compliant prestress (CPS) fixation system obviates the need for long intramedullary stems. The CPS was designed to provide a stable, high-pressure, motion-free bone-implant interface that would prevent aseptic loosening and allow osseointegration at the bone-implant interface. At 10 months, the fourth patient in the human trial required amputation. Backscatter electron microscopy revealed a buttress of new bone had formed along 70% of the bone-metal interface, with excellent bony ingrowth (average: 42%) into the transverse, porous-coated titanium interface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10917246     DOI: 10.3928/0147-7447-20000701-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  21 in total

1.  Surgical technique: Methods for removing a Compress® compliant prestress implant.

Authors:  Geoffrey D Abrams; Varun K Gajendran; David G Mohler; Raffi S Avedian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Early distal femoral endoprosthetic survival: cemented stems versus the Compress implant.

Authors:  A A Bhangu; M J Kramer; R J Grimer; R J O'Donnell
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-09-16       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Early equivalence of uncemented press-fit and Compress femoral fixation.

Authors:  German L Farfalli; Patrick J Boland; Carol D Morris; Edward A Athanasian; John H Healey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  How Often Does Spindle Failure Occur in Compressive Osseointegration Endoprostheses for Oncologic Reconstruction?

Authors:  Lauren H Goldman; Lee J Morse; Richard J O'Donnell; Rosanna L Wustrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  What Factors Are Associated With Failure of Compressive Osseointegration Fixation?

Authors:  Ryland Kagan; Jacob Adams; Caroline Schulman; Rachel Laursen; Karina Espana; Jung Yoo; Yee-Cheen Doung; James Hayden
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Compressive osseointegration into a custom acetabular implant masquerading as tumor recurrence: a case report.

Authors:  Adam J Schwartz; Christopher P Beauchamp
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Chemotherapy Curtails Bone Formation From Compliant Compression Fixation of Distal Femoral Endoprostheses.

Authors:  Mohammad A Elalfy; Patrick J Boland; John H Healey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Compressive osseointegration promotes viable bone at the endoprosthetic interface: retrieval study of Compress implants.

Authors:  M J Kramer; B J Tanner; A E Horvai; R J O'Donnell
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Compress periprosthetic fractures: interface stability and ease of revision.

Authors:  Wakenda K Tyler; John H Healey; Carol D Morris; Patrick J Boland; Richard J O'Donnell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Compressive osseointegration of tibial implants in primary cancer reconstruction.

Authors:  Richard J O'Donnell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.