Literature DB >> 17576145

Attentional control and the relatedness proportion effect in semantic priming.

Keith A Hutchison1.   

Abstract

In 2 experiments, participants completed both an attentional control battery (OSPAN, antisaccade, and Stroop tasks) and a modified semantic priming task. The priming task measured relatedness proportion (RP) effects within subjects, with the color of the prime indicating the probability that the to-be-named target would be related. In Experiment 2, participants were cued before each trial with the probability of a related target. Stimulus onset asynchronies traditionally thought to tap automatic processing (267 ms) versus controlled processing (1,240 ms) were used. Across experiments, principal component analysis on the battery revealed a general attentional control component. Moreover, the RP effect increased linearly with attentional control in both experiments. It is concluded that RP effects produced in this paradigm depend purely upon the effortful process of expectancy generation, which renders them sensitive to individual differences in attentional control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17576145     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  29 in total

1.  Rational Adaptation in Lexical Prediction: The Influence of Prediction Strength.

Authors:  Tal Ness; Aya Meltzer-Asscher
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-04-14

2.  Spatiotemporal Signatures of Lexical-Semantic Prediction.

Authors:  Ellen F Lau; Kirsten Weber; Alexandre Gramfort; Matti S Hämäläinen; Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  An RT distribution analysis of relatedness proportion effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization reveals different mechanisms.

Authors:  Bianca de Wit; Sachiko Kinoshita
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-01

4.  It takes time to prime: semantic priming in the ocular lexical decision task.

Authors:  Renske S Hoedemaker; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Dissociating N400 effects of prediction from association in single-word contexts.

Authors:  Ellen F Lau; Phillip J Holcomb; Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Remembering to prepare: The benefits (and costs) of high working memory capacity.

Authors:  Lauren L Richmond; Thomas S Redick; Todd S Braver
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Neural evidence for Bayesian trial-by-trial adaptation on the N400 during semantic priming.

Authors:  Nathaniel Delaney-Busch; Emily Morgan; Ellen Lau; Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-02-20

8.  Nicotine does not enhance basic semantic priming.

Authors:  Anna D Holmes; Helen J Chenery; David A Copland
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 2.331

10.  A method for processing multivariate data in medical studies.

Authors:  Olivier A Coubard
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-03-31       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.