Literature DB >> 1757524

Using PCR in preimplantation genetic disease diagnosis.

W Navidi1, N Arnheim.   

Abstract

Preimplantation diagnosis of genetic disease can be accomplished by embryo biopsy or polar body analysis using in-vitro gene amplification (PCR). PCR analysis of single cells is subject to a number of errors which decrease the reliability of the diagnosis. Using realistic assumptions about error rates based on experimental data, we analyse some of the practical consequences to be faced by whose wishing to use this diagnostic procedure. We considered both autosomal dominant and recessive diseases. We calculate the probability of making mistakes in the diagnosis, assuming a realistic range in the magnitude of PCR efficiency, cell transfer, and contamination errors. We conclude that, in general, analysing blastomeres is subject to less mis-diagnosis than polar body analysis, except in the case of dominant diseases which are caused by genes which lie extremely close to the centromere. We also show that typing multiple blastomeres from a single embryo or combining polar body typing with blastomere analysis results in significantly lower levels of mis-diagnosis with unacceptable consequences. The preimplantation diagnosis of X-linked diseases based upon Y chromosome sequence analysis is also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1757524     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  11 in total

1.  Digital PCR.

Authors:  B Vogelstein; K W Kinzler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Molecular diagnostics in preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Alan R Thornhill; Karen Snow
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  Whole genome amplification from a single cell: implications for genetic analysis.

Authors:  L Zhang; X Cui; K Schmitt; R Hubert; W Navidi; N Arnheim
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A multiple-tubes approach for accurate genotyping of very small DNA samples by using PCR: statistical considerations.

Authors:  W Navidi; N Arnheim; M S Waterman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 5.  Controversies and opinions in embryo culture: two- to four-cell transfer vs blastocyst.

Authors:  V N Bolton
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Preimplantation single-cell analysis of multiple genetic loci by whole-genome amplification.

Authors:  M C Snabes; S S Chong; S B Subramanian; K Kristjansson; D DiSepio; M R Hughes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-06-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Preimplantation diagnosis.

Authors:  J D Goldberg; M C Martin; R V Lebo; R A Pedersen
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1993-09

8.  Development and validation of laboratory procedures for preimplantation diagnosis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  C Holding; D Bentley; R Roberts; M Bobrow; C Mathew
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 9.  Current progress in preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Y Verlinsky; A Handyside; J L Simpson; R Edwards; A Kuliev; A Muggleton-Harris; C Readhead; I Liebaers; E Coonen; M Plachot
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Allelic Dropout Is a Common Phenomenon That Reduces the Diagnostic Yield of PCR-Based Sequencing of Targeted Gene Panels.

Authors:  Anna G Shestak; Anna A Bukaeva; Siamak Saber; Elena V Zaklyazminskaya
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.