BACKGROUND: Airflow limitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is caused by a mixture of small airway disease and emphysema, the relative contributions of which may vary among patients. Phenotypes of COPD classified purely based on severity of emphysema are not well defined and may be different from the classic phenotypes of "pink puffers" and "blue bloaters". METHODS: To characterise clinical phenotypes based on severity of emphysema, 274 subjects with COPD were recruited, excluding those with physician-diagnosed bronchial asthma. For all subjects a detailed interview of disease history and symptoms, quality of life (QOL) measurement, blood sampling, pulmonary function tests before and after inhalation of salbutamol (0.4 mg) and high-resolution CT scanning were performed. RESULTS: Severity of emphysema visually evaluated varied widely even among subjects with the same stage of disease. No significant differences were noted among three groups of subjects classified by severity of emphysema in age, smoking history, chronic bronchitis symptoms, blood eosinophil count, serum IgE level or bronchodilator response. However, subjects with severe emphysema had significantly lower body mass index (BMI) and poorer QOL scores, evaluated using St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), than those with no/mild emphysema (mean (SD) BMI 21.2 (0.5) vs 23.5 (0.3) kg/m(2), respectively; SGRQ total score 40 (3) vs 28 (2), respectively; p<0.001 for both). These characteristics held true even if subjects with the same degree of airflow limitation were chosen. CONCLUSIONS: The severity of emphysema varies widely even in patients with the same stage of COPD, and chronic bronchitis symptoms are equally distributed irrespective of emphysema severity. Patients with the phenotype in which emphysema predominates have lower BMI and poorer health-related QOL.
BACKGROUND: Airflow limitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is caused by a mixture of small airway disease and emphysema, the relative contributions of which may vary among patients. Phenotypes of COPD classified purely based on severity of emphysema are not well defined and may be different from the classic phenotypes of "pink puffers" and "blue bloaters". METHODS: To characterise clinical phenotypes based on severity of emphysema, 274 subjects with COPD were recruited, excluding those with physician-diagnosed bronchial asthma. For all subjects a detailed interview of disease history and symptoms, quality of life (QOL) measurement, blood sampling, pulmonary function tests before and after inhalation of salbutamol (0.4 mg) and high-resolution CT scanning were performed. RESULTS: Severity of emphysema visually evaluated varied widely even among subjects with the same stage of disease. No significant differences were noted among three groups of subjects classified by severity of emphysema in age, smoking history, chronic bronchitis symptoms, blood eosinophil count, serum IgE level or bronchodilator response. However, subjects with severe emphysema had significantly lower body mass index (BMI) and poorer QOL scores, evaluated using St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), than those with no/mild emphysema (mean (SD) BMI 21.2 (0.5) vs 23.5 (0.3) kg/m(2), respectively; SGRQ total score 40 (3) vs 28 (2), respectively; p<0.001 for both). These characteristics held true even if subjects with the same degree of airflow limitation were chosen. CONCLUSIONS: The severity of emphysema varies widely even in patients with the same stage of COPD, and chronic bronchitis symptoms are equally distributed irrespective of emphysema severity. Patients with the phenotype in which emphysema predominates have lower BMI and poorer health-related QOL.
Authors: Antònia Domingo-Salvany; Rosa Lamarca; Montserrat Ferrer; Judith Garcia-Aymerich; Jordi Alonso; Miquel Félez; Ahmad Khalaf; Ramon M Marrades; Eduard Monsó; Joan Serra-Batlles; Josep M Antó Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2002-09-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Bartolome R Celli; Claudia G Cote; Jose M Marin; Ciro Casanova; Maria Montes de Oca; Reina A Mendez; Victor Pinto Plata; Howard J Cabral Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-03-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: James C Hogg; Fanny Chu; Soraya Utokaparch; Ryan Woods; W Mark Elliott; Liliana Buzatu; Ruben M Cherniack; Robert M Rogers; Frank C Sciurba; Harvey O Coxson; Peter D Paré Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-06-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Seth T Bartel; Andrew J Bierhals; Thomas K Pilgram; Cheng Hong; Kenneth B Schechtman; Susan H Conradi; David S Gierada Journal: Med Phys Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: M Ishijima; H Nakayama; T Itonaga; Y Tajima; S Shiraishi; M Okubo; R Mikami; K Tokuuye Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2014-12-09 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Song Soo Kim; Joon Beom Seo; Ho Yun Lee; Dipti V Nevrekar; Anna V Forssen; James D Crapo; Joyce D Schroeder; David A Lynch Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-12-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Michael H Cho; George R Washko; Thomas J Hoffmann; Gerard J Criner; Eric A Hoffman; Fernando J Martinez; Nan Laird; John J Reilly; Edwin K Silverman Journal: Respir Res Date: 2010-03-16