Literature DB >> 17573434

Probability of the site juxtaposition determines the rate of protein-mediated DNA looping.

Yury S Polikanov1, Vladimir A Bondarenko, Vladimir Tchernaenko, Yong I Jiang, Leonard C Lutter, Alexander Vologodskii, Vasily M Studitsky.   

Abstract

Numerous biological processes are regulated by DNA elements that communicate with their targets over a distance via formation of protein-bridged DNA loops. One of the first questions arising in studies of DNA looping is whether the rate of loop formation is limited by diffusion of the DNA sites. We addressed this question by comparing the in vitro measured rates of transcription initiation in the NtrC-glnAp2 enhancer-dependent transcription initiation system with predictions of two different theoretical models. The promoter and enhancer were in a 7.6-kb plasmid and separated by 2.5 kb. The measurements were performed for different values of the plasmid superhelix density, from 0 to -0.07. Earlier theoretical analysis, based on the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA conformations, showed that if the rate of loop formation is determined by the equilibrium probability of juxtaposition of the DNA sites, the rate should be approximately 100 times higher in supercoiled than in relaxed DNA. On the other hand, Brownian dynamics simulation showed that if the rate of loop formation is limited by the site diffusion, it should be nearly independent of DNA supercoiling. We found that efficiency of the transcription initiation increases by nearly two orders of magnitude as a result of the corresponding increase of the template supercoiling. This clearly shows that the rate of bridging in the enhancer-promoter system is not limited by diffusion of the DNA sites to one another. We argue that this conclusion derived for the specific system is likely to be valid for the great majority of biological processes involving protein-mediated DNA looping.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17573434      PMCID: PMC1989718          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.111245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  37 in total

Review 1.  The bacterial enhancer-binding protein NtrC as a molecular machine.

Authors:  I Rombel; A North; I Hwang; C Wyman; S Kustu
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1998

2.  Physical evidence for a phosphorylation-dependent conformational change in the enhancer-binding protein NtrC.

Authors:  I Hwang; T Thorgeirsson; J Lee; S Kustu; Y K Shin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The bacterial enhancer-binding protein NTRC is a molecular machine: ATP hydrolysis is coupled to transcriptional activation.

Authors:  A Wedel; S Kustu
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1995-08-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 4.  DNA topoisomerases.

Authors:  J C Wang
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 5.  Going the distance: a current view of enhancer action.

Authors:  E M Blackwood; J T Kadonaga
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-07-03       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Effect of supercoiling on the juxtaposition and relative orientation of DNA sites.

Authors:  A Vologodskii; N R Cozzarelli
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Unusual oligomerization required for activity of NtrC, a bacterial enhancer-binding protein.

Authors:  C Wyman; I Rombel; A K North; C Bustamante; S Kustu
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Action at a distance along a DNA.

Authors:  J C Wang; G N Giaever
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-04-15       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Transcriptional activation via DNA-looping: visualization of intermediates in the activation pathway of E. coli RNA polymerase x sigma 54 holoenzyme by scanning force microscopy.

Authors:  K Rippe; M Guthold; P H von Hippel; C Bustamante
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-07-11       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  RNA polymerase II holoenzyme recruitment is sufficient to remodel chromatin at the yeast PHO5 promoter.

Authors:  L Gaudreau; A Schmid; D Blaschke; M Ptashne; W Hörz
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-04-04       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  21 in total

1.  Internucleosomal interactions mediated by histone tails allow distant communication in chromatin.

Authors:  Olga I Kulaeva; Guohui Zheng; Yury S Polikanov; Andrew V Colasanti; Nicolas Clauvelin; Swagatam Mukhopadhyay; Anirvan M Sengupta; Vasily M Studitsky; Wilma K Olson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Unlinking of supercoiled DNA catenanes by type IIA topoisomerases.

Authors:  Alexander Vologodskii
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Effect of supercoiling on the λ switch.

Authors:  Kamilla Norregaard; Magnus Andersson; Kim Sneppen; Peter Eigil Nielsen; Stanley Brown; Lene B Oddershede
Journal:  Bacteriophage       Date:  2014-01-01

4.  DNA supercoiling enhances cooperativity and efficiency of an epigenetic switch.

Authors:  Kamilla Norregaard; Magnus Andersson; Kim Sneppen; Peter Eigil Nielsen; Stanley Brown; Lene B Oddershede
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  DNA cyclization and looping in the wormlike limit: Normal modes and the validity of the harmonic approximation.

Authors:  Stefan M Giovan; Andreas Hanke; Stephen D Levene
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.505

6.  Free-energy calculations for semi-flexible macromolecules: applications to DNA knotting and looping.

Authors:  Stefan M Giovan; Robert G Scharein; Andreas Hanke; Stephen D Levene
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 7.  Towards quantitative analysis of gene regulation by enhancers.

Authors:  Ekaterina V Nizovtseva; Stefjord Todolli; Wilma K Olson; Vasily M Studitsky
Journal:  Epigenomics       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 4.778

Review 8.  Distant activation of transcription: mechanisms of enhancer action.

Authors:  Olga I Kulaeva; Ekaterina V Nizovtseva; Yury S Polikanov; Sergei V Ulianov; Vasily M Studitsky
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Quantitation of interactions between two DNA loops demonstrates loop domain insulation in E. coli cells.

Authors:  David G Priest; Sandip Kumar; Yan Yan; David D Dunlap; Ian B Dodd; Keith E Shearwin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Simulation of DNA catenanes.

Authors:  Alexander Vologodskii; Valentin V Rybenkov
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 3.676

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.