Literature DB >> 17573202

What proportion of breast cancers are detected by mammography in the United States?

Nancy Breen1, K Robin Yabroff, Helen I Meissner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: None of the recent national studies has ascertained how women's breast cancer was detected in the United States. To rectify this gap, questions were added to the leading national health survey. Mammography was of special interest because it is widely used in the US and has evidence of a mortality benefit.
METHODS: We used the 2003 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), to ascertain the self-reported modalities used to detect breast cancer in the non-institutionalized US population. The study included 345 women 40-84 years of age who, in 2003, reported a personal history of breast cancer. We examined the frequency of self-reported characteristics and tested for association with mammography-detected breast cancer using logistic regression.
RESULTS: Among the survivors in 2003, the percentage of breast cancers detected by mammography was much higher after 2001 (59%) than before 1993 (29%). Breast cancer survivors with less than high school education or less than US$ 20,000 household income were less likely to report detection by mammography.
CONCLUSIONS: Women reported mammography-detected breast cancer at a slightly higher rate than published studies of mammography sensitivity and use would suggest. Lower rates of mammography-detected breast cancers among survivors with low income or low education raise the question whether mammography is underutilized as a diagnostic tool, especially for underserved women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17573202     DOI: 10.1016/j.cdp.2007.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev        ISSN: 0361-090X


  19 in total

1.  Significance of increasing poverty levels for determining late-stage breast cancer diagnosis in 1990 and 2000.

Authors:  Janis Barry; Nancy Breen; Michael Barrett
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Pointing the way to informed medical decision making: test characteristics of clinical breast examination.

Authors:  Mary B Barton; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Self-detection remains a key method of breast cancer detection for U.S. women.

Authors:  Mara Y Roth; Joann G Elmore; Joyce P Yi-Frazier; Lisa M Reisch; Natalia V Oster; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Variation in Breast Cancer-Risk Factor Associations by Method of Detection: Results From a Series of Case-Control Studies.

Authors:  Brian L Sprague; Ronald E Gangnon; John M Hampton; Kathleen M Egan; Linda J Titus; Karla Kerlikowske; Patrick L Remington; Polly A Newcomb; Amy Trentham-Dietz
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Stage of breast cancer at diagnosis among low-income women with access to mammography.

Authors:  Rebecca Lobb; John Z Ayanian; Jennifer D Allen; Karen M Emmons
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Insurance-Based Differences in Time to Diagnostic Follow-up after Positive Screening Mammography.

Authors:  Danielle D Durham; Whitney R Robinson; Sheila S Lee; Stephanie B Wheeler; Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; J Michael Bowling; Andrew F Olshan; Louise M Henderson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Method of detection of breast cancer in low-income women.

Authors:  Amardeep Thind; Allison Diamant; Lalima Hoq; Rose Maly
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Barriers to adherence to screening mammography among women with disabilities.

Authors:  Bonnie C Yankaskas; Pamela Dickens; J Michael Bowling; Molly P Jarman; Karen Luken; Kathryn Salisbury; Jacqueline Halladay; Carol E Lorenz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Radiologist characteristics associated with interpretive performance of diagnostic mammography.

Authors:  Diana L Miglioretti; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Linn Abraham; R James Brenner; Patricia A Carney; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Diana S M Buist; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Access to mammography screening in a large urban population: a multi-level analysis.

Authors:  Stephen C Meersman; Nancy Breen; Linda W Pickle; Helen I Meissner; Paul Simon
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-06-20       Impact factor: 2.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.