Literature DB >> 17572200

Radical prostatectomy shortly after prostate biopsy does not affect operative difficulty or efficacy.

Scott E Eggener1, Ofer Yossepowitch, Angel M Serio, Andrew J Vickers, Peter T Scardino, James A Eastham.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether radical prostatectomy (RP) conducted before 4 or 6 weeks after prostate biopsy is associated with surgical difficulty or efficacy. Many urologists recommend an interval of at least 4 to 6 weeks between prostate biopsy and RP.
METHODS: Using our surgical database, we identified 2996 men undergoing open RP and compared the outcomes after surgery stratified by the interval from biopsy, analyzed as a dichotomous variable with cutpoints of either 4 or 6 weeks. The estimated blood loss and operating room time were considered surrogates for surgical difficulty, and surgical margin status and postoperative urinary and erectile function surrogates for surgical efficacy. We used regression models to assess whether the time to RP affected these surgical outcomes after controlling for the surgeon, surgeon experience, and various clinical and pathologic disease features.
RESULTS: The interval between biopsy and RP was 4 weeks or less for 168 men (6%) and 6 weeks or less for 416 men (14%). Using an interval of 4 weeks or less or 6 weeks or less, multivariate mixed effects regression analyses did not show a significant association between early surgery and operating room time, estimated blood loss, surgical margin status, urinary continence, or erectile function (all P > or = 0.18). Our results were sufficiently precise to exclude an important effect of early surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study have shown that performing radical prostatectomy shortly after prostate biopsy, within 4 to 6 weeks, does not adversely influence surgical difficulty or efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17572200     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.01.089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  13 in total

1.  Biopsy related prostate status does not affect on the clinicopathological outcome of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hoon Choi; Young Hwii Ko; Sung Gu Kang; Seok Ho Kang; Hong Seok Park; Jun Cheon; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 4.679

2.  Can robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) be performed very soon after biopsy?

Authors:  Jung Ki Jo; Jong Jin Oh; Sangchul Lee; Seong Jin Jeong; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Does time interval between prostate biopsy and surgery affect outcomes of radical prostatectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jie Li; Qing Jiang; Qiubo Li; Yuanfeng Zhang; Liang Gao
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Does periprostatic local anesthesia for prostate biopsy affect the operative difficulty of open radical prostatectomy? A prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Haga; Ken Aikawa; Kei Ishibashi; Tomohiko Yanagida; Norio Takahashi; Souichiro Ogawa; Toshiki Oguro; Masao Kataoka; Chiharu Irisawa; Yoshiyuki Kojima
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Predictive preoperative factors for positive surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy in low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Turgay Turan; Uğur Boylu; Cem Başataç; Eyüp Gümüş
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2013-06

6.  Local staging of prostate cancer: comparative accuracy of T2-weighted endorectal MR imaging and transrectal ultrasound.

Authors:  Adam J Jung; Fergus V Coakley; Katsuto Shinohara; Peter R Carroll; John Kurhanewicz; Janet E Cowan; Antonio C Westphalen
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 1.605

7.  Significance of postbiopsy hemorrhage observed on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in performing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sung Kyu Hong; Dae Sung Kim; Won Ki Lee; Hongzoo Park; Jeong Kwon Kim; Seung Hwan Doo; Seong Jin Jeong; Cheol Yong Yoon; Seok-Soo Byun; Sung Il Hwang; Hak Jong Lee; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-01-10       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Interval from Prostate Biopsy to Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (RALP): Effects on Surgical Difficulties.

Authors:  In Sung Kim; Woong Na; Jung Su Nam; Jong Jin Oh; Chang Wook Jeong; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-10-19

9.  Definitive 3D-CRT for clinically localized prostate cancer: modifications of the clinical target volume following a prostate MRI and the clinical benefits.

Authors:  Shinsaku Yamaguchi; Takayuki Ohguri; Masami Fujii; Katsuya Yahara; Yoshiko Hayashida; Naohiro Fujimoto; Yukunori Korogi
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-07-15

10.  Interval from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy does not affect immediate operative outcomes for open or minimally invasive approach.

Authors:  Bumsoo Park; Seol Ho Choo; Hwang Gyun Jeon; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Hyun Moo Lee; Han Yong Choi
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.