BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The size of vestibular aqueducts (VAs) seen on CT studies varies. The current practice of calling a VA enlarged when it exceeds a certain threshold (eg, 1.5 mm at the midpoint) is arbitrary. Our hypothesis was that statistical analysis of the range of VA widths in a normal-hearing population would lead to a mathematic definition of the upper-limit-of-normal VA width. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The VA midpoint and opercular widths were measured in 73 children with normal hearing. Statistical analysis yielded values of the 99 th, 97.5th, 95th, 90th, 75th, and 50th percentiles for this normal distribution. RESULTS: The upper-limit-of-normal (95th percentile) values for the VA midpoint and opercular widths were 0.9 and 1.9 mm, respectively. The VAs with greater widths may reasonably be considered enlarged. CONCLUSION: The VAs with midpoint or opercular widths of 1.0 and 2.0 mm or greater, respectively, are enlarged.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The size of vestibular aqueducts (VAs) seen on CT studies varies. The current practice of calling a VA enlarged when it exceeds a certain threshold (eg, 1.5 mm at the midpoint) is arbitrary. Our hypothesis was that statistical analysis of the range of VA widths in a normal-hearing population would lead to a mathematic definition of the upper-limit-of-normal VA width. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The VA midpoint and opercular widths were measured in 73 children with normal hearing. Statistical analysis yielded values of the 99 th, 97.5th, 95th, 90th, 75th, and 50th percentiles for this normal distribution. RESULTS: The upper-limit-of-normal (95th percentile) values for the VA midpoint and opercular widths were 0.9 and 1.9 mm, respectively. The VAs with greater widths may reasonably be considered enlarged. CONCLUSION: The VAs with midpoint or opercular widths of 1.0 and 2.0 mm or greater, respectively, are enlarged.
Authors: J Selhub; P F Jacques; I H Rosenberg; G Rogers; B A Bowman; E W Gunter; J D Wright; C L Johnson Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1999-09-07 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: H C Davidson; H R Harnsberger; M M Lemmerling; A A Mancuso; D K White; K A Tong; R T Dahlen; C Shelton Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Margaret A Kenna; Heidi L Rehm; Anna Frangulov; Henry A Feldman; Caroline D Robson Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2011-02-04 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Kenneth H Lee; Daniel A Larson; Gordon Shott; Brian Rasmussen; Aliza P Cohen; Corning Benton; Mark Halsted; Daniel Choo; Jareen Meinzen-Derr; John H Greinwald Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 3.325