Literature DB >> 17569596

Development and validation of a low-literacy opioid contract.

Lorraine S Wallace1, Amy J Keenum, Steven E Roskos, Kelly S McDaniel.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Opioid contracts (OPCs) are often used to outline the criteria and circumstances for which opioid medications are prescribed. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate an English-language, low-literacy OPC. Specifically, the low-literacy OPC was designed to outline proper administration of prescribed medication(s) as well as highlight patient responsibilities and expectations. A 4-step process was used to develop and validate the low-literacy OPC, including: (1) content identification; (2) attention to low-literacy guidelines; (3) evaluation based on Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM) criteria; and (4) pilot testing with patients (n = 18) to assess comprehension. Final OPC content, presented largely in bulleted format, was based on current literature and consensus of the first 3 authors. The 4-part OPC was formatted on 8(1/2) x 11 inch paper using 16- to 24-point size Arial-style font. The 6-page OPC, written at the 7(th) reading grade level, included 12 recognizable clipart-type illustrations to supplement written text. Two reviewers scored the OPC in the superior range based on total SAM percentage scores. Nineteen (n = 19) of the 26 statements were comprehended by all patients completing the pilot testing. Overall, the low-literacy OPC is comprehensive, valid, readable, and formatted according to established low-literacy guidelines. PERSPECTIVE: This study describes the development and validation of a low-literacy, English-language OPC. The OPC was formatted using low-literacy guidelines and validated with a sample of patients to confirm understanding of content. Accordingly, the low-literacy OPC is suitable for use in routine clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17569596     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  6 in total

1.  Prescribing of opioid analgesics and related mortality before and after the introduction of long-acting oxycodone.

Authors:  Irfan A Dhalla; Muhammad M Mamdani; Marco L A Sivilotti; Alex Kopp; Omar Qureshi; David N Juurlink
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Developing and Initiating Validation of a Model Opioid Patient-Prescriber Agreement as a Tool for Patient-Centered Pain Treatment.

Authors:  Mary P Ghods; Ian T Schmid; Carol A Pamer; Brian M Lappin; Dale C Slavin
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  It made my life a little easier: primary care providers' beliefs and attitudes about using opioid treatment agreements.

Authors:  Joanna L Starrels; Bryan Wu; Deena Peyser; Aaron D Fox; Abigail Batchelder; Frances K Barg; Julia H Arnsten; Chinazo O Cunningham
Journal:  J Opioid Manag       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr

4.  Power and control: contracts and the patient-physician relationship.

Authors:  S R Lieber; S Y Kim; M L Volk
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  How Do Clinicians of Different Specialties Perceive and Use Opioid Risk Mitigation Strategies? A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Michelle S Keller; Alma Jusufagic; Teryl K Nuckols; Jack Needleman; MarySue V Heilemann
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 2.164

6.  The relationship between patients' income and education and their access to pharmacological chronic pain management: A scoping review.

Authors:  Nicole Atkins; Karim Mukhida
Journal:  Can J Pain       Date:  2022-09-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.