BACKGROUND: Opioid treatment agreements generally are used in pain treatment to delineate the terms and consequences of opioid use and abuse. METHODS: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Safe Use Initiative convened a multi-disciplinary working group with outside experts to draft a patient-centered, model opioid treatment agreement named the Model Patient-Prescriber Agreement (model PPA). The model PPA was evaluated for readability and usability in two tests that sampled both healthcare professional and non-healthcare professional FDA employees. In a survey sent to FDA employees in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), 209 respondents assessed the quality of the content and the level of difficulty in reading and understanding the model PPA. Ten other FDA employees participated in usability testing to assess the effectiveness of the model PPA as an educational and decision-making tool. RESULTS: The majority of the 209 CDER employee survey respondents indicated the model PPA was neutral in tone (67.5%) and easy or somewhat easy to understand (90.4%). Usability study participants generally thought the model PPA would facilitate discussion between patient and prescriber and that the content was informative, thorough, and clear. CONCLUSIONS: These studies suggest that the working group was able to develop an opioid PPA that may be acceptable and usable among a diverse population of stakeholders. A follow-up pilot study using the model PPA in medical facilities in the USA with patients is underway and will facilitate this determination.
BACKGROUND: Opioid treatment agreements generally are used in pain treatment to delineate the terms and consequences of opioid use and abuse. METHODS: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Safe Use Initiative convened a multi-disciplinary working group with outside experts to draft a patient-centered, model opioid treatment agreement named the Model Patient-Prescriber Agreement (model PPA). The model PPA was evaluated for readability and usability in two tests that sampled both healthcare professional and non-healthcare professional FDA employees. In a survey sent to FDA employees in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), 209 respondents assessed the quality of the content and the level of difficulty in reading and understanding the model PPA. Ten other FDA employees participated in usability testing to assess the effectiveness of the model PPA as an educational and decision-making tool. RESULTS: The majority of the 209 CDER employee survey respondents indicated the model PPA was neutral in tone (67.5%) and easy or somewhat easy to understand (90.4%). Usability study participants generally thought the model PPA would facilitate discussion between patient and prescriber and that the content was informative, thorough, and clear. CONCLUSIONS: These studies suggest that the working group was able to develop an opioid PPA that may be acceptable and usable among a diverse population of stakeholders. A follow-up pilot study using the model PPA in medical facilities in the USA with patients is underway and will facilitate this determination.
Authors: Declan T Barry; Kevin S Irwin; Emlyn S Jones; William C Becker; Jeanette M Tetrault; Lynn E Sullivan; Helena Hansen; Patrick G O'Connor; Richard S Schottenfeld; David A Fiellin Journal: J Pain Date: 2010-06-02 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Salahadin Abdi; Sairam Atluri; Carl C Balog; Ramsin M Benyamin; Mark V Boswell; Keith R Brown; Brian M Bruel; David A Bryce; Patricia A Burks; Allen W Burton; Aaron K Calodney; David L Caraway; Kimberly A Cash; Paul J Christo; Kim S Damron; Sukdeb Datta; Timothy R Deer; Sudhir Diwan; Ike Eriator; Frank J E Falco; Bert Fellows; Stephanie Geffert; Christopher G Gharibo; Scott E Glaser; Jay S Grider; Haroon Hameed; Mariam Hameed; Hans Hansen; Michael E Harned; Salim M Hayek; Standiford Helm; Joshua A Hirsch; Jeffrey W Janata; Alan D Kaye; Adam M Kaye; David S Kloth; Dhanalakshmi Koyyalagunta; Marion Lee; Yogesh Malla; Kavita N Manchikanti; Carla D McManus; Vidyasagar Pampati; Allan T Parr; Ramarao Pasupuleti; Vikram B Patel; Nalini Sehgal; Sanford M Silverman; Vijay Singh; Howard S Smith; Lee T Snook; Daneshvari R Solanki; Deborah H Tracy; Ricardo Vallejo; Bradley W Wargo Journal: Pain Physician Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Roger Chou; Gilbert J Fanciullo; Perry G Fine; Jeremy A Adler; Jane C Ballantyne; Pamela Davies; Marilee I Donovan; David A Fishbain; Kathy M Foley; Jeffrey Fudin; Aaron M Gilson; Alexander Kelter; Alexander Mauskop; Patrick G O'Connor; Steven D Passik; Gavril W Pasternak; Russell K Portenoy; Ben A Rich; Richard G Roberts; Knox H Todd; Christine Miaskowski Journal: J Pain Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Michelle S Keller; Alma Jusufagic; Teryl K Nuckols; Jack Needleman; MarySue V Heilemann Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2021-05-22 Impact factor: 2.164