Literature DB >> 12091684

Extraprostatic spread of clinically localized prostate cancer: factors predictive of pT3 tumor and of positive endorectal MR imaging examination results.

François Cornud1, Thierry Flam, Laurent Chauveinc, Khaled Hamida, Yves Chrétien, Annick Vieillefond, Olivier Hélénon, Jean François Moreau.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify the factor(s) most predictive of pT3 tumor and those most predictive of a positive endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging result in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: At multivariate analysis, five preoperative clinical parameters-prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, digital rectal examination (DRE) result, Gleason score and number of involved sextants at transrectal US-guided biopsy, and endorectal MR imaging result-were used to predict pT3 tumor in 336 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. On the basis of results of the first four examinations, multivariate analysis was performed also to determine predictors of a positive MR imaging study.
RESULTS: Significant predictors of pT3 tumor were positive MR imaging result (P < 2 x 10(-8)), more than one sextant involved at biopsy (P < 5 x 10(-5)), and PSA level greater than 10 ng/mL (P < 7 x 10(-3)). Significant predictors of a positive MR imaging result were three or more sextants involved at biopsy (P < 10(-5)), positive DRE result (P < 5 x 10(-3)), and PSA level greater than 10 ng/mL (P < 16 x 10(-3)). In the subgroup of 175 patients who had at least three positive biopsy specimens, the sensitivity of MR imaging was 50% for detection of occult pT3 tumor and 69% for detection of extensive pT3 tumor. The overall specificity of MR imaging was 95%.
CONCLUSION: Endorectal MR imaging seems to be indicated in carefully selected patients-specifically, those with three or more positive biopsy specimens, a palpable tumor, and/or a PSA level greater than 10 ng/mL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12091684     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2241011001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  26 in total

1.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the prostate: is this the way to proceed for characterization of prostatic carcinoma?

Authors:  R H Oyen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Prostate MR imaging at high-field strength: evolution or revolution?

Authors:  Olivier Rouvière; Robert P Hartman; Denis Lyonnet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-09-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Perspectives for preventive screening with total body MRI.

Authors:  Susanne C Ladd; Mark E Ladd
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Clinical use of magnetic resonance imaging across the prostate brachytherapy workflow.

Authors:  P Blanchard; C Ménard; S J Frank
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer: prediction with combined T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MR imaging.

Authors:  Jing Ren; Yi Huan; He Wang; YaLi Ge; YingJuan Chang; Hong Yin; LiJun Sun
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer: evaluation by using multiparametric endorectal MR imaging.

Authors:  Fatma Nur Soylu; Yahui Peng; Yulei Jiang; Shiyang Wang; Christine Schmid-Tannwald; Ila Sethi; Scott Eggener; Tatjana Antic; Aytekin Oto
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Accuracy of preoperative endorectal MRI in predicting extracapsular extension and influence on neurovascular bundle sparing in radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Matthias C Roethke; Matthias P Lichy; Michaela Kniess; Matthias K Werner; Claus D Claussen; Arnulf Stenzl; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; David Schilling
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Can 3T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging accurately detect prostate cancer extracapsular extension?

Authors:  Yannick Cerantola; Massimo Valerio; Aida Kawkabani Marchini; Jean-Yves Meuwly; Patrice Jichlinski
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  MR imaging-guided interventions in the genitourinary tract: an evolving concept.

Authors:  Fiona M Fennessy; Kemal Tuncali; Paul R Morrison; Clare M Tempany
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.266

10.  Preoperative 3-Tesla multiparametric endorectal magnetic resonance imaging findings and the odds of upgrading and upstaging at radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  John V Hegde; Ming-Hui Chen; Robert V Mulkern; Fiona M Fennessy; Anthony V D'Amico; Clare M C Tempany
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.