UNLABELLED: The aim of this survey study with 7,083 male respondents was to examine the association between socioeconomic, health and health behavioural risk indicators and fractures. In the multivariate regression model, fractures were associated strongest with frequency of drunkenness, regular sports training, frequent use of health care services and obesity. INTRODUCTION: Little is known about the risk factors for fractures in young adults. Our aim was to identify the association between socioeconomic background, health and health behaviours and fractures. METHODS: The survey sample comprised 7,378 conscript males (median age 19), of which 7,083 (96%) answered. The outcome was self-reported fracture. Associations between 20 background variables and fractures were analysed with logistic regression. RESULTS: Altogether 2,456 (34.7%) participants reported fracture(s) during their lifetime. The most common anatomical locations of fracture were the forearm, the hand and the ankle. The strongest risk indicators for fractures were frequent drunkenness (OR 1.7; 95% CI: 1.3-2.0), regular sports training (OR 1.6; 95% CI: 1.3-1.9), frequent use of health care services (OR 1.5; 95% CI: 1.3-1.8) and obesity (OR 1.5; 95% CI: 1.2-1.9). CONCLUSIONS: This is among the first studies to describe risk indicators for fractures in young adults. The strongest risk factors for fractures were associated with health damaging behaviour, high-intensity physical activity and use of health care services. Of socioeconomic background factors, only living in the capital city area was associated with fractures. Preventive measures should be targeted at the males frequently using health care services or actively participating in sports.
UNLABELLED: The aim of this survey study with 7,083 male respondents was to examine the association between socioeconomic, health and health behavioural risk indicators and fractures. In the multivariate regression model, fractures were associated strongest with frequency of drunkenness, regular sports training, frequent use of health care services and obesity. INTRODUCTION: Little is known about the risk factors for fractures in young adults. Our aim was to identify the association between socioeconomic background, health and health behaviours and fractures. METHODS: The survey sample comprised 7,378 conscript males (median age 19), of which 7,083 (96%) answered. The outcome was self-reported fracture. Associations between 20 background variables and fractures were analysed with logistic regression. RESULTS: Altogether 2,456 (34.7%) participants reported fracture(s) during their lifetime. The most common anatomical locations of fracture were the forearm, the hand and the ankle. The strongest risk indicators for fractures were frequent drunkenness (OR 1.7; 95% CI: 1.3-2.0), regular sports training (OR 1.6; 95% CI: 1.3-1.9), frequent use of health care services (OR 1.5; 95% CI: 1.3-1.8) and obesity (OR 1.5; 95% CI: 1.2-1.9). CONCLUSIONS: This is among the first studies to describe risk indicators for fractures in young adults. The strongest risk factors for fractures were associated with health damaging behaviour, high-intensity physical activity and use of health care services. Of socioeconomic background factors, only living in the capital city area was associated with fractures. Preventive measures should be targeted at the males frequently using health care services or actively participating in sports.
Authors: K L Reynolds; H A Heckel; C E Witt; J W Martin; J A Pollard; J J Knapik; B H Jones Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 1994 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Jennifer M Hootman; Carol A Macera; Barbara E Ainsworth; Cheryl L Addy; Malissa Martin; Steven N Blair Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Anne W Riley; Christopher B Forrest; George W Rebok; Barbara Starfield; Bert F Green; Judith A Robertson; Phyllis Friello Journal: Med Care Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; H Johansson; C De Laet; J A Eisman; S Fujiwara; H Kroger; E V McCloskey; D Mellstrom; L J Melton; H Pols; J Reeve; A Silman; A Tenenhouse Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2004-06-03 Impact factor: 4.507