Literature DB >> 17560743

Evaluation of radiometric faecal culture and direct PCR on pooled faeces for detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in cattle.

Graeme J Eamens1, Richard J Whittington, Mark J Turner, Susan L Austin, Shayne A Fell, Ian B Marsh.   

Abstract

Dilution rates for pooled faecal culture (PFC) and direct IS900 polymerase chain reaction (D-PCR) tests were evaluated on faecal samples from infected cows mixed with uninfected faeces in dilutions from 1 in 5 to 1 in 50. PFC was performed by radiometric culture, with confirmation by IS900 PCR and restriction endonuclease analysis (PCR/REA) on growth, and by mycobactin dependency testing on solid medium. Using 37 culture positive faecal samples from 12 subclinical cows, 83.8% and 94.6% of samples were confirmed positive in the PFC assay at dilutions of 1 in 50 and 1 in 30, respectively. Lower dilutions (1 in 5 to 1 in 20) provided only marginally better sensitivity, and confirmation of PFC growth by PCR/REA was significantly more sensitive than mycobactin dependency. D-PCR had significantly lower sensitivity than PFC confirmed by PCR/REA, with pools of 1 in 50, 30, 10 and 5 yielding positive results in 64.9%, 70.3%, 78.4% and 83.8% of samples, respectively. Cattle considered to be shedding 1.5 x 10(6) viable M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis (Map)/g faeces (on the basis of estimated losses in processing and growth rates in radiometric broth) were positive at dilutions up to 1 in 50 in the PFC and D-PCR. Those shedding 5 x 10(5) viable Map/g were positive in the PFC at dilutions up to 1 in 40, but required a 1 in 10 dilution or less for D-PCR. The results suggest that for cattle shedding relatively high concentrations of Map in faeces (>2 x 10(5) viable Map/g), maximal dilutions of 1 in 30 for PFC and 1 in 10 for D-PCR would be applicable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17560743     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.04.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  8 in total

1.  Culture- and quantitative IS900 real-time PCR-based analysis of the persistence of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in a controlled dairy cow farm environment.

Authors:  M Moravkova; V Babak; A Kralova; I Pavlik; I Slana
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Rapid and sensitive method to identify Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in cow's milk by DNA methylase genotyping.

Authors:  Silvia Leonor Mundo; Liliana Rosa Gilardoni; Federico José Hoffman; Osvaldo Jorge Lopez
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Factors affecting isolation and identification of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis from fecal and tissue samples in a liquid culture system.

Authors:  Richard J Whittington
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Diagnosis and Molecular Characterization of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis from Dairy Cows in Colombia.

Authors:  J A Fernández-Silva; A Abdulmawjood; M Bülte
Journal:  Vet Med Int       Date:  2011-06-15

Review 5.  Control of paratuberculosis: who, why and how. A review of 48 countries.

Authors:  Richard Whittington; Karsten Donat; Maarten F Weber; David Kelton; Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Suzanne Eisenberg; Norma Arrigoni; Ramon Juste; Jose Luis Sáez; Navneet Dhand; Annalisa Santi; Anita Michel; Herman Barkema; Petr Kralik; Polychronis Kostoulas; Lorna Citer; Frank Griffin; Rob Barwell; Maria Aparecida Scatamburlo Moreira; Iva Slana; Heike Koehler; Shoor Vir Singh; Han Sang Yoo; Gilberto Chávez-Gris; Amador Goodridge; Matjaz Ocepek; Joseba Garrido; Karen Stevenson; Mike Collins; Bernardo Alonso; Karina Cirone; Fernando Paolicchi; Lawrence Gavey; Md Tanvir Rahman; Emmanuelle de Marchin; Willem Van Praet; Cathy Bauman; Gilles Fecteau; Shawn McKenna; Miguel Salgado; Jorge Fernández-Silva; Radka Dziedzinska; Gustavo Echeverría; Jaana Seppänen; Virginie Thibault; Vala Fridriksdottir; Abdolah Derakhshandeh; Masoud Haghkhah; Luigi Ruocco; Satoko Kawaji; Eiichi Momotani; Cord Heuer; Solis Norton; Simeon Cadmus; Angelika Agdestein; Annette Kampen; Joanna Szteyn; Jenny Frössling; Ebba Schwan; George Caldow; Sam Strain; Mike Carter; Scott Wells; Musso Munyeme; Robert Wolf; Ratna Gurung; Cristobal Verdugo; Christine Fourichon; Takehisa Yamamoto; Sharada Thapaliya; Elena Di Labio; Monaya Ekgatat; Andres Gil; Alvaro Nuñez Alesandre; José Piaggio; Alejandra Suanes; Jacobus H de Waard
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Flock sensitivity and specificity of pooled fecal qPCR and pooled serum ELISA for screening ovine paratuberculosis.

Authors:  Yoann Mathevon; Gilles Foucras; Fabien Corbière
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Estimating the sensitivity and specificity of serum ELISA and pooled and individual fecal PCR for detecting Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis in Canadian cow-calf herds using Bayesian latent class models.

Authors:  Paisley Johnson; Lianne McLeod; John Campbell; Marjolaine Rousseau; Kathy Larson; Cheryl Waldner
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-07-29

8.  Determining an optimal pool size for testing beef herds for Johne's disease in Australia.

Authors:  Anna Ly; Navneet K Dhand; Evan S G Sergeant; Ian Marsh; Karren M Plain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.