Literature DB >> 17560249

Inguinal node dissection for melanoma in the era of sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Michael S Sabel1, Kent A Griffith, Alisha Arora, Josef Shargorodsky, Dan G Blazer, Riley Rees, Sandra L Wong, Vincent M Cimmino, Alfred E Chang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the introduction of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for melanoma, inguinal lymph node dissections (ILND) are more commonly performed for microscopic disease than for clinically palpable disease. We sought to examine the effect this change has on the morbidity of the operation.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent an ILND for melanoma between October 1997 and April, 2006. Clinical and pathologic data were collected and correlated by multivariate analysis with the incidence of a major wound complication.
RESULTS: We identified 212 patients, 132 who underwent an ILND for a positive SLN and 80 for clinically palpable disease. Age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) were similar in both groups. Patients with clinically palpable disease had a significantly greater number of involved nodes (3.0 vs 1.96, P = .0013), more often had >or=4 involved nodes (29% vs 9%, P < .001), and a greater incidence of extranodal extension (47% vs 5%, P < .001). Of the 212 patients, 41 (19%) had a significant wound complication. This complication was significantly higher among patients with clinical disease compared to patients with a positive SLN (28% vs 14%, P = .02). Only BMI (odds ratio of 1.1) and the indication for the procedure (odds ratio of 2.2) were independent predictors of a major wound complication. Lymphedema occurred in 30% of the patients and was only significantly associated with clinical disease (41% vs 24%, P = .025). With a median follow-up of 2 years, regional recurrence was not significantly greater in patients with clinically palpable disease (13% vs 9%, P = not significant [ns]), although this result was possibly due to the significantly greater rate of distant recurrence (49% vs 18%, P < .001) and death (48% vs 21%) in these patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing an ILND for a positive SLN have a significantly lower risk of postoperative complication or lymphedema than do patients undergoing ILND for clinically palpable disease. There is a benefit in regard to the morbidity of treatment in surgically staging melanoma patients by SLN biopsy and preventing ILND for palpable disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17560249     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  20 in total

1.  Enhanced postoperative lymphatic staging of malignant melanoma by endoscopically assisted iliacoinguinal dissection.

Authors:  I M Ising; A Bembenek; R Gutzmer; F Köckerling; K T Moesta
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Prospective assessment of postoperative complications and associated costs following inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) in melanoma patients.

Authors:  Sharon B Chang; Robert L Askew; Yan Xing; Storm Weaver; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Jeffrey E Lee; Richard Royal; Anthony Lucci; Merrick I Ross; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Safety and Feasibility of Minimally Invasive Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Melanoma (SAFE-MILND): Report of a Prospective Multi-institutional Trial.

Authors:  James W Jakub; Alicia M Terando; Amod Sarnaik; Charlotte E Ariyan; Mark B Faries; Sabino Zani; Heather B Neuman; Nabil Wasif; Jeffrey M Farma; Bruce J Averbook; Karl Y Bilimoria; Travis E Grotz; Jacob B Jake Allred; Vera J Suman; Mary Sue Brady; Douglas Tyler; Jeffrey D Wayne; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Management of Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Completion Lymphadenectomy, Radiation, or Both?

Authors:  Matthew C Perez; Daniel E Oliver; Evan S Weitman; David Boulware; Jane L Messina; Javier Torres-Roca; C Wayne Cruse; Ricardo J Gonzalez; Amod A Sarnaik; Vernon K Sondak; Evan J Wuthrick; Louis B Harrison; Jonathan S Zager
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Systematic review of quality of life and patient reported outcomes in patients with oncologic related lower extremity lymphedema.

Authors:  Yeliz Cemal; Sarah Jewell; Claudia R Albornoz; Andrea Pusic; Babak J Mehrara
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.589

6.  The rationale for sentinel-node biopsy in primary melanoma.

Authors:  Donald L Morton; Alistair J Cochran; John F Thompson
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Oncol       Date:  2008-09

7.  Nonsentinel node metastases in melanoma: do they reflect the biology of the tumor, the lymph node or the surgeon? : Editorial to Accompany Ghaferi et al., ASO-2009-03-0312.R1.

Authors:  Vernon K Sondak
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Wound complications after inguinal lymph node dissection for melanoma: is ACS NSQIP adequate?

Authors:  Carly E Glarner; David Y Greenblatt; Robert J Rettammel; Heather B Neuman; Sharon M Weber
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Why does no one want to perform lymph node dissection anymore?

Authors:  Kelly M McMasters
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Quality of life after axillary or groin sentinel lymph node biopsy, with or without completion lymph node dissection, in patients with cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Mattijs de Vries; Harald J Hoekstra; Josette E H M Hoekstra-Weebers
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.