PURPOSE: To present initial results of a clinical trial of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) aiming to spare the swallowing structures whose dysfunction after chemoradiation is a likely cause of dysphagia and aspiration, without compromising target doses. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This was a prospective, longitudinal study of 36 patients with Stage III-IV oropharyngeal (31) or nasopharyngeal (5) cancer. Definitive chemo-IMRT spared salivary glands and swallowing structures: pharyngeal constrictors (PC), glottic and supraglottic larynx (GSL), and esophagus. Lateral but not medial retropharyngeal nodes were considered at risk. Dysphagia endpoints included objective swallowing dysfunction (videofluoroscopy), and both patient-reported and observer-rated scores. Correlations between doses and changes in these endpoints from pre-therapy to 3 months after therapy were assessed. RESULTS: Significant correlations were observed between videofluoroscopy-based aspirations and the mean doses to the PC and GSL, as well as the partial volumes of these structures receiving 50-65 Gy; the highest correlations were associated with doses to the superior PC (p = 0.005). All patients with aspirations received mean PC doses >60 Gy or PC V(65) >50%, and GSL V(50) >50%. Reduced laryngeal elevation and epiglottic inversion were correlated with mean PC and GSL doses (p < 0.01). All 3 patients with strictures had PC V(70) >50%. Worsening patient-reported liquid swallowing was correlated with mean PC (p = 0.05) and esophageal (p = 0.02) doses. Only mean PC doses were correlated with worsening patient-reported solid swallowing (p = 0.04) and observer-rated swallowing scores (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: These dose-volume-effect relationships provide initial IMRT optimization goals and motivate further efforts to reduce swallowing structures doses to reduce dysphagia and aspiration.
PURPOSE: To present initial results of a clinical trial of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) aiming to spare the swallowing structures whose dysfunction after chemoradiation is a likely cause of dysphagia and aspiration, without compromising target doses. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This was a prospective, longitudinal study of 36 patients with Stage III-IV oropharyngeal (31) or nasopharyngeal (5) cancer. Definitive chemo-IMRT spared salivary glands and swallowing structures: pharyngeal constrictors (PC), glottic and supraglottic larynx (GSL), and esophagus. Lateral but not medial retropharyngeal nodes were considered at risk. Dysphagia endpoints included objective swallowing dysfunction (videofluoroscopy), and both patient-reported and observer-rated scores. Correlations between doses and changes in these endpoints from pre-therapy to 3 months after therapy were assessed. RESULTS: Significant correlations were observed between videofluoroscopy-based aspirations and the mean doses to the PC and GSL, as well as the partial volumes of these structures receiving 50-65 Gy; the highest correlations were associated with doses to the superior PC (p = 0.005). All patients with aspirations received mean PC doses >60 Gy or PC V(65) >50%, and GSL V(50) >50%. Reduced laryngeal elevation and epiglottic inversion were correlated with mean PC and GSL doses (p < 0.01). All 3 patients with strictures had PC V(70) >50%. Worsening patient-reported liquid swallowing was correlated with mean PC (p = 0.05) and esophageal (p = 0.02) doses. Only mean PC doses were correlated with worsening patient-reported solid swallowing (p = 0.04) and observer-rated swallowing scores (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: These dose-volume-effect relationships provide initial IMRT optimization goals and motivate further efforts to reduce swallowing structures doses to reduce dysphagia and aspiration.
Authors: Mary Feng; Jean M Moran; Todd Koelling; Aamer Chughtai; June L Chan; Laura Freedman; James A Hayman; Reshma Jagsi; Shruti Jolly; Janice Larouere; Julie Soriano; Robin Marsh; Lori J Pierce Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-04-24 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Thomas J Galloway; Miriam N Lango; Barbara Burtness; Ranee Mehra; Karen Ruth; John A Ridge Journal: Head Neck Date: 2012-02-02 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: David L Schwartz; Katherine Hutcheson; Denise Barringer; Susan L Tucker; Merrill Kies; F Christopher Holsinger; K Kian Ang; William H Morrison; David I Rosenthal; Adam S Garden; Lei Dong; Jan S Lewin Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-06-18 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Daniel Pak; Karen Vineberg; Felix Feng; Randall K Ten Haken; Avraham Eisbruch Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Bonnie Martin-Harris; David McFarland; Elizabeth G Hill; Charlton B Strange; Kendrea L Focht; Zhuang Wan; Julie Blair; Katlyn McGrattan Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2014-12-11 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Jeffrey M Vainshtein; Matthew E Spector; Mohannad Ibrahim; Carol R Bradford; Gregory T Wolf; Matthew H Stenmark; Francis P Worden; Jonathan B McHugh; Mark E Prince; Thomas Carey; Douglas B Chepeha; Avraham Eisbruch Journal: Head Neck Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Diane Wenhua Chen; Jan S Lewin; Li Xu; Stephen Y Lai; G Brandon Gunn; Clifton David Fuller; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Aasheesh Kanwar; Erich M Sturgis; Katherine A Hutcheson Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2016-10-03 Impact factor: 3.497