PURPOSE: This study assessed the radiopacity of five luting cements, five dowels, and five core build-up materials using two target distances. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Materials were analyzed using a modified version of ISO protocol 4049. samples 1 mm thick were digitally radiographed alongside a stepwedge of aluminum alloy 1100 using a Trophy RVG-4 CCD sensor and 70 kVp X-ray generator. The gray-scale values of the stepwedge and sample were converted to X-ray absorbencies. The relationship between X-ray absorbance and aluminum thickness was linear for thicknesses less than 10 mm and followed a power-law relationship above 10 mm. These relations were used to convert the absorbencies of the samples into aluminum thicknesses. The radiopacity data was subjected to ANOVA/Student-Newman-Keuls testing. RESULTS: All materials were more radiopaque than equivalent thicknesses of aluminum. Each product category contained a wide range of radiopacities. Syringe-dispensed materials tended to be less radiopaque than materials dispensed by mechanically assisted syringe or mixed by hand (p < 0.01). Target distance did not affect the measured radiopacity so long as the exposure time was suitably adjusted (p= 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: All luting cements and core materials met or exceeded the ISO minimums. The tested metal-reinforced glass ionomer core build-up materials were extremely radiopaque. Some publications suggest that excessively radiopaque core materials can hinder a clinician's ability to spot voids or marginal defects.
PURPOSE: This study assessed the radiopacity of five luting cements, five dowels, and five core build-up materials using two target distances. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Materials were analyzed using a modified version of ISO protocol 4049. samples 1 mm thick were digitally radiographed alongside a stepwedge of aluminum alloy 1100 using a Trophy RVG-4 CCD sensor and 70 kVp X-ray generator. The gray-scale values of the stepwedge and sample were converted to X-ray absorbencies. The relationship between X-ray absorbance and aluminum thickness was linear for thicknesses less than 10 mm and followed a power-law relationship above 10 mm. These relations were used to convert the absorbencies of the samples into aluminum thicknesses. The radiopacity data was subjected to ANOVA/Student-Newman-Keuls testing. RESULTS: All materials were more radiopaque than equivalent thicknesses of aluminum. Each product category contained a wide range of radiopacities. Syringe-dispensed materials tended to be less radiopaque than materials dispensed by mechanically assisted syringe or mixed by hand (p < 0.01). Target distance did not affect the measured radiopacity so long as the exposure time was suitably adjusted (p= 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: All luting cements and core materials met or exceeded the ISO minimums. The tested metal-reinforced glass ionomer core build-up materials were extremely radiopaque. Some publications suggest that excessively radiopaque core materials can hinder a clinician's ability to spot voids or marginal defects.