Literature DB >> 17558881

Active movement measurements of the shoulder girdle in healthy subjects with goniometer and tape measure techniques: a study on reliability and validity.

Sylvie Nadeau1, Stéphanie Kovacs, Denis Gravel, France Piotte, Hélène Moffet, Denis Gagnon, Luc J Hébert.   

Abstract

In response to the current need to develop objective measurement techniques for active movements of the shoulder girdle, this study had two goals: 1) to evaluate the reliability of the active range of motion (AROM) of shoulder girdle in elevation, protraction, and retraction with use of a goniometer and a tape measure and 2) to present the criterion-related validity of the reliable movements. Thirty healthy subjects performed two trials of each shoulder girdle AROM. They were assessed by two physical therapists, who used both evaluation techniques on two occasions. The generalizability theory was used to compute intratester (test-retest) and intertester reliability using dependability coefficients (phi) and standard errors of measurement (SEMs). The shoulder girdle movements were then evaluated with a movement analysis system (Optotrak 3020). The Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (r) and paired t-tests were used to compare the results of clinical measurements with those of the movement analysis system. Overall, the reliability with the tape measure was good (phi = 0.78-0.91; SEM's = 0.7-1.1 cm) for the elevation motion. The goniometer was only reliable for intratester measures (phi = 0.78-0.79; SEM = 2.7 degrees) for the elevation motion. Retraction was reliable with the tape measure alone (phi = 0.76-0.84; SEM's = 0.5-0.7 cm). The criterion-related validity analysis revealed that measuring shoulder girdle elevation with the tape measure and goniometer, and retraction with the tape measure were not valid when evaluated against a gold standard, thus, both techniques have limitations in assessing true elevation and retraction measurements.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17558881     DOI: 10.1080/09593980701209246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiother Theory Pract        ISSN: 0959-3985            Impact factor:   2.279


  4 in total

1.  Evaluating change in clinical status: reliability and measures of agreement for the assessment of glenohumeral range of motion.

Authors:  Susan W Muir; Charlene Luciak Corea; Lauren Beaupre
Journal:  N Am J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2010-09

2.  Passive range of motion in patients with adhesive shoulder capsulitis, an intertester reliability study over eight weeks.

Authors:  Satya Pal Sharma; Anders Bærheim; Alice Kvåle
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Reproducibility of a 3-dimensional gyroscope in measuring shoulder anteflexion and abduction.

Authors:  Ludo I F Penning; Nick A Guldemond; Rob A de Bie; Geert H I M Walenkamp
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Which method for frozen shoulder mobilization: manual posterior capsule stretching or scapular mobilization?

Authors:  Irem Duzgun; Elif Turgut; Leyla Eraslan; Bulent Elbasan; Deran Oskay; Ozgur Ahmet Atay
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 2.041

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.