Literature DB >> 17558787

Consent and counter-mobilization: the case of the national smokers alliance.

Michael Givel1.   

Abstract

Throughout the 1990s, health advocates engaged in a significant mobilization against the dangers of tobacco use and the tobacco industry. In 1993, the tobacco industry counter-mobilized through the National Smokers Alliance (NSA), a public relations created front group funded by the tobacco industry, which operated nationally from 1994 to 1999 to advocate for adults using tobacco products without vigorous regulation or increased tobacco taxes. The mobilization by health groups utilized traditional political lobbying and education of the public and public officials without a national public relations created front group to mold public opinion. The counter-mobilization by the NSA was based on traditional lobbying approaches in conjunction with the use of the public relations oriented consent engineering theory of Edward Bernays, Harold Lasswell, and others. This consent engineering theory calls for public relations specialists using public relations to mold public opinion to support a client's preferred public policy outputs. Despite the use of traditional lobbying in conjunction with the use of public relations efforts, attempts by the NSA to dominate public policy to weaken or neutralize stronger tobacco regulations and taxes were effective only for some campaigns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17558787     DOI: 10.1080/10810730701326002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Commun        ISSN: 1081-0730


  7 in total

1.  Veterans' views on military tobacco use and tobacco control policy.

Authors:  E A Smith; W S C Poston; C K Haddock; S A Jahnke; R E Malone
Journal:  Mil Behav Health       Date:  2017-09-22

Review 2.  "Nicotine Nazis strike again": a brief analysis of the use of Nazi rhetoric in attacking tobacco control advocacy.

Authors:  Nick K Schneider; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 3.  What is known about tobacco industry efforts to influence tobacco tax? A systematic review of empirical studies.

Authors:  Katherine E Smith; Emily Savell; Anna B Gilmore
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Tobacco industry efforts to undermine policy-relevant research.

Authors:  Anne Landman; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  The Policy Dystopia Model: An Interpretive Analysis of Tobacco Industry Political Activity.

Authors:  Selda Ulucanlar; Gary J Fooks; Anna B Gilmore
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Developing more detailed taxonomies of tobacco industry political activity in low-income and middle-income countries: qualitative evidence from eight countries.

Authors:  Britta Katharina Matthes; Kathrin Lauber; Mateusz Zatoński; Lindsay Robertson; Anna B Gilmore
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-03

7.  An argument for phasing out sales of cigarettes.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Smith; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 7.552

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.