Literature DB >> 17558419

Getting it right: designing microarray (and not 'microawry') comparative genomic hybridization studies for cancer research.

David S P Tan1, Maryou B K Lambros, Rachael Natrajan, Jorge S Reis-Filho.   

Abstract

The development of high-resolution microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), using cDNA, bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) and oligonucleotide probes, is providing tremendous opportunities for translational research by facilitating detailed analysis of entire cancer genomes in a single experiment. However, this technology will only fulfil its promise if studies incorporating aCGH are designed with a full understanding of its current limitations and the strategies available to circumvent them. While there have been several excellent reviews on the current status of this technology, there is currently very little guidance available regarding the appropriate design of experiments incorporating aCGH (including the strengths and weaknesses of each platform), and how best to combine the results obtained from aCGH with other 'omic' technologies, including gene expression. In this review, we present the key design issues that need to be considered in order to optimize aCGH studies, including sample selection, the definition of appropriate experimental objectives, arguments for and against the various microarray platforms that are currently available, and methods for data validation and integration. It is envisaged that future well-designed aCGH studies will enhance our understanding of the genetic basis of cancer, and lead to the identification of novel predictive and prognostic cancer biomarkers, as well as molecular therapeutic targets in cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17558419     DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.3700593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Invest        ISSN: 0023-6837            Impact factor:   5.662


  20 in total

Review 1.  Genomics in mammalian cell culture bioprocessing.

Authors:  Diane M Wuest; Sarah W Harcum; Kelvin H Lee
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 14.227

Review 2.  Integrating high-throughput technologies in the quest for effective biomarkers for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Vathany Kulasingam; Maria P Pavlou; Eleftherios P Diamandis
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 3.  Whole genome scanning as a cytogenetic tool in hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Jaroslaw P Maciejewski; Ghulam J Mufti
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Clinical application of targeted and genome-wide technologies: can we predict treatment responses in chronic lymphocytic leukemia?

Authors:  Reem Alsolami; Samantha Jl Knight; Anna Schuh
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  From bench to bedside: the growing use of translational research in cancer medicine.

Authors:  Erin M Goldblatt; Wen-Hwa Lee
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 6.  The need for additional genetic markers for myelodysplastic syndrome stratification: what does the future hold for prognostication?

Authors:  Zaher K Otrock; Ramon V Tiu; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski; Mikkael A Sekeres
Journal:  Expert Rev Hematol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.929

7.  Immunophenotypic and genomic characterization of papillary carcinomas of the breast.

Authors:  Raphaëlle Duprez; Paul M Wilkerson; Magali Lacroix-Triki; Maryou B Lambros; Alan MacKay; Roger A'Hern; Arnaud Gauthier; Vidya Pawar; Pierre-Emanuel Colombo; Frances Daley; Rachael Natrajan; Eric Ward; Gaëtan MacGrogan; Flavie Arbion; Patrick Michenet; Britta Weigelt; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 7.996

8.  Integrative molecular profiling of triple negative breast cancers identifies amplicon drivers and potential therapeutic targets.

Authors:  N Turner; M B Lambros; H M Horlings; A Pearson; R Sharpe; R Natrajan; F C Geyer; M van Kouwenhove; B Kreike; A Mackay; A Ashworth; M J van de Vijver; J S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  A novel method, digital genome scanning detects KRAS gene amplification in gastric cancers: involvement of overexpressed wild-type KRAS in downstream signaling and cancer cell growth.

Authors:  Hiroaki Mita; Minoru Toyota; Fumio Aoki; Hirofumi Akashi; Reo Maruyama; Yasushi Sasaki; Hiromu Suzuki; Masashi Idogawa; Lisa Kashima; Kazuyoshi Yanagihara; Masahiro Fujita; Masao Hosokawa; Masanobu Kusano; Sorin Vasile Sabau; Haruyuki Tatsumi; Kohzoh Imai; Yasuhisa Shinomura; Takashi Tokino
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.