Literature DB >> 18505780

Whole genome scanning as a cytogenetic tool in hematologic malignancies.

Jaroslaw P Maciejewski1, Ghulam J Mufti.   

Abstract

Over the years, methods of cytogenetic analysis evolved and became part of routine laboratory testing, providing valuable diagnostic and prognostic information in hematologic disorders. Karyotypic aberrations contribute to the understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of disease and thereby to rational application of therapeutic modalities. Most of the progress in this field stems from the application of metaphase cytogenetics (MC), but recently, novel molecular technologies have been introduced that complement MC and overcome many of the limitations of traditional cytogenetics, including a need for cell culture. Whole genome scanning using comparative genomic hybridization and single nucleotide polymorphism arrays (CGH-A; SNP-A) can be used for analysis of somatic or clonal unbalanced chromosomal defects. In SNP-A, the combination of copy number detection and genotyping enables diagnosis of copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity, a lesion that cannot be detected using MC but may have important pathogenetic implications. Overall, whole genome scanning arrays, despite the drawback of an inability to detect balanced translocations, allow for discovery of chromosomal defects in a higher proportion of patients with hematologic malignancies. Newly detected chromosomal aberrations, including somatic uniparental disomy, may lead to more precise prognostic schemes in many diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18505780      PMCID: PMC2515145          DOI: 10.1182/blood-2008-02-130435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  79 in total

Review 1.  AML1 and the AML1-ETO fusion protein in the pathogenesis of t(8;21) AML.

Authors:  J D Licht
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2001-09-10       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  CDKN2A deletions in acute lymphoblastic leukemia of adolescents and young adults: an array CGH study.

Authors:  Anu Usvasalo; Suvi Savola; Riikka Räty; Kim Vettenranta; Arja Harila-Saari; Pirjo Koistinen; Eeva-Riitta Savolainen; Erkki Elonen; Ulla M Saarinen-Pihkala; Sakari Knuutila
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 3.156

3.  Acquired uniparental disomy of chromosome 9p is a frequent stem cell defect in polycythemia vera.

Authors:  Robert Kralovics; Yongli Guan; Josef T Prchal
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Gene expression analysis using oligonucleotide arrays produced by maskless photolithography.

Authors:  Emile F Nuwaysir; Wei Huang; Thomas J Albert; Jaz Singh; Kate Nuwaysir; Alan Pitas; Todd Richmond; Tom Gorski; James P Berg; Jeff Ballin; Mark McCormick; Jason Norton; Tim Pollock; Terry Sumwalt; Lawrence Butcher; DeAnn Porter; Michael Molla; Christine Hall; Fred Blattner; Michael R Sussman; Rodney L Wallace; Franco Cerrina; Roland D Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 5.  Chromosome and molecular abnormalities in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Pierre Fenaux
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.490

6.  Comparative genomic hybridization study of de novo myeloid neoplasia.

Authors:  M V Castuma; P H Rao; S H Acevedo; I B Larripa
Journal:  Acta Haematol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.195

7.  Absence of the wild-type allele predicts poor prognosis in adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia with normal cytogenetics and the internal tandem duplication of FLT3: a cancer and leukemia group B study.

Authors:  S P Whitman; K J Archer; L Feng; C Baldus; B Becknell; B D Carlson; A J Carroll; K Mrózek; J W Vardiman; S L George; J E Kolitz; R A Larson; C D Bloomfield; M A Caligiuri
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  The application of comparative genomic hybridization as an additional tool in the chromosome analysis of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  M H Kim; J Stewart; C Devlin; Y T Kim; E Boyd; M Connor
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  2001-04-01

9.  Detection of submicroscopic constitutional chromosome aberrations in clinical diagnostics: a validation of the practical performance of different array platforms.

Authors:  Zhong-Fa Zhang; Claudia Ruivenkamp; Johan Staaf; Hongbo Zhu; Michela Barbaro; David Petillo; Sok Kean Khoo; Ake Borg; Yao-Shan Fan; Jacqueline Schoumans
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Pretreatment cytogenetic abnormalities are predictive of induction success, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival in adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 8461).

Authors:  John C Byrd; Krzysztof Mrózek; Richard K Dodge; Andrew J Carroll; Colin G Edwards; Diane C Arthur; Mark J Pettenati; Shivanand R Patil; Kathleen W Rao; Michael S Watson; Prasad R K Koduru; Joseph O Moore; Richard M Stone; Robert J Mayer; Eric J Feldman; Frederick R Davey; Charles A Schiffer; Richard A Larson; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  36 in total

Review 1.  Pathogenesis and consequences of uniparental disomy in cancer.

Authors:  Hideki Makishima; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Genome-wide Mapping of Copy Number Variations Using SNP Arrays.

Authors:  Daniel Nowak; Wolf-Karsten Hofmann; H Phillip Koeffler
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.747

3.  Statistical genetic issues for genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Bruce S Weir
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.166

4.  The vanguard has arrived in the clinical laboratory: array-based karyotyping for prognostic markers in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Shelly R Gunn
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  The Third Consensus Conference on the treatment of aplastic anemia.

Authors:  Seiji Kojima; Shinji Nakao; Neal Young; Andrea Bacigalupo; Gerard Gerard; Naoto Hirano; Jaroslaw Maciejewski; Joachim Deeg; Judith Marsh; Feng-Kui Zhang; Jong Wook Lee; Keiya Ozawa
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.490

6.  Polymorphisms in microRNA-related genes are associated with survival of patients with T-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Xi Li; Xiaobo Tian; Bo Zhang; Jieping Chen
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-02-21

7.  250K single nucleotide polymorphism array karyotyping identifies acquired uniparental disomy and homozygous mutations, including novel missense substitutions of c-Cbl, in myeloid malignancies.

Authors:  Andrew J Dunbar; Lukasz P Gondek; Christine L O'Keefe; Hideki Makishima; Manjot S Rataul; Hadrian Szpurka; Mikkael A Sekeres; Xiao Fei Wang; Michael A McDevitt; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Mutations of an E3 ubiquitin ligase c-Cbl but not TET2 mutations are pathogenic in juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Hideki Muramatsu; Hideki Makishima; Anna M Jankowska; Heather Cazzolli; Christine O'Keefe; Nao Yoshida; Yinyan Xu; Nobuhiro Nishio; Asahito Hama; Hiroshi Yagasaki; Yoshiyuki Takahashi; Koji Kato; Atsushi Manabe; Seiji Kojima; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Mutations of e3 ubiquitin ligase cbl family members constitute a novel common pathogenic lesion in myeloid malignancies.

Authors:  Hideki Makishima; Heather Cazzolli; Hadrian Szpurka; Andrew Dunbar; Ramon Tiu; Jungwon Huh; Hideki Muramatsu; Christine O'Keefe; Eric Hsi; Ronald L Paquette; Seiji Kojima; Alan F List; Mikkael A Sekeres; Michael A McDevitt; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Single nucleotide polymorphism arrays: a decade of biological, computational and technological advances.

Authors:  Thomas LaFramboise
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.