Literature DB >> 17556904

Temperature-controlled radiofrequency energy (SECCA) to the anal canal for the treatment of faecal incontinence offers moderate improvement.

Richelle J Felt-Bersma1, Maria M Szojda, Chris J Mulder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Faecal incontinence is a devastating complaint. Even after conservative treatment, many patients still remain incontinent. Few patients have a sphincter defect suitable for repair. Other emerging surgical therapies like dynamic gracilis plasty, neuromodulation or artificial bowel sphincter, carry side effects and show only moderate improvement. Temperature-controlled radiofrequency energy (SECCA) has shown promising results in the USA. Local tightening seems to be the mode of action with possible increased rectal sensitivity. We investigated the effectiveness of radiofrequency and possible changes in the anal sphincter with 3D-ultrasound in patients with faecal incontinence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eleven women, mean age 61 years (49-73) with long-standing faecal incontinence were included. Patients with large sphincter defects and anal stenosis were excluded. The SECCA procedure was performed under conscious sedation and local anaesthesia. Oral antibiotics were given. In four quadrants on four or five levels (depending upon length of the anus) radiofrequency was delivered with multiple needle electrodes. Patients were evaluated at 0, 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months and 1 year. Three-dimensional anal ultrasound was performed at 0 (before and after the procedure), 6 weeks and 3 months. Anal manometry and rectal compliance measurement were performed at 0 and 3 months.
RESULTS: At 3 months, six of 11 patients improved, which persisted during follow-up of 1 year. The Vaizey score changed from 18.8 to 15.0 (P=0.03) and in those improved from 18.3 to 11.5 (P=0.03). Anal manometry and rectal compliance showed no significant changes, there was a tendency to increased rectal sensitivity concerning urge and maximal tolerated volume (both P=0.3). Responders compared with nonresponders showed no difference in test results. Side effects were local haematoma (2), bleeding 3 days (1), pain persisting 1-3 weeks (4) and laxatives-related diarrhoea during 1-3 weeks (4).
CONCLUSION: The SECCA procedure seems to be promising for patients with faecal incontinence with a persisting effect after 1 year. No significant changes in tests were found.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17556904     DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32811ec010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0954-691X            Impact factor:   2.566


  10 in total

Review 1.  Current management of fecal incontinence: choosing amongst treatment options to optimize outcomes.

Authors:  Julie Ann M Van Koughnett; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Current status: new technologies for the treatment of patients with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Andreas M Kaiser; Guy R Orangio; Massarat Zutshi; Suraj Alva; Tracy L Hull; Peter W Marcello; David A Margolin; Janice F Rafferty; W Donald Buie; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Clinical Challenges of Fecal Incontinence in the Elderly.

Authors:  Hadie Razjouyan; Shanti Prasad; Sita Chokhavatia
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09

4.  Clinical response and sustainability of treatment with temperature-controlled radiofrequency energy (Secca) in patients with faecal incontinence: 3 years follow-up.

Authors:  T J Lam; A P Visscher; M M Meurs-Szojda; R J F Felt-Bersma
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Temperature-controlled radio frequency energy delivery (Secca procedure) for the treatment of fecal incontinence: results of a prospective study.

Authors:  B Lefebure; J J Tuech; V Bridoux; S Gallas; A M Leroi; P Denis; F Michot
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Referral for anorectal function evaluation is indicated in 65% and beneficial in 92% of patients.

Authors:  Maria M Szojda; Erik Tanis; Chris J J Mulder; Richelle J F Felt-Bersma
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  What's New in the Toolbox for Constipation and Fecal Incontinence?

Authors:  Yeong Yeh Lee
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2014-03-24

8.  Sphincteroplasty for anal incontinence.

Authors:  Lorenzo Carlo Pescatori; Mario Pescatori
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2014-03-04

9.  Temperature-controlled radiofrequency energy in patients with anal incontinence: an interim analysis of worldwide data.

Authors:  Richelle J F Felt-Bersma
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2014-04-12

Review 10.  Current and emerging treatment options for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Satish S C Rao
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.062

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.