Literature DB >> 17556171

What does the clinical cardiologist need from noninvasive cardiac imaging: is it time to adjust practices to meet evolving demands?

William Wijns1, Bernard De Bruyne, Piet K Vanhoenacker.   

Abstract

With the recent emergence of multidetector computed tomography angiography, coronary anatomy can now be assessed noninvasively. Until this advancement, functional noninvasive imaging used to serve as a gatekeeper that governed access to invasive diagnosis by coronary angiography and subsequent therapy. In the current era the threshold for access to coronary anatomy will be lowered. Functional noninvasive imaging will often come second, while anatomy is known already. If appropriate use of revascularization procedures is to be promoted, functional evaluation shall play an even greater role than before as a guide for selection of therapy. In subjects screened while the atherosclerotic disease is still at a preclinical stage, the ability to image plaque activity in the absence of flow-limiting stenosis will be essential in our attempts to prevent sudden ischemic cardiac death and unheralded myocardial infarction. In patients with advanced age and extensive obstructive disease, the diagnostic performance of functional testing will have to be raised by shifting from "per-patient" to "per-vessel" accuracy. Reengineering of currently available methods or the development of novel technologies that provide an integrative evaluation of anatomy and function will be necessary. With the availability of an increasing number of imaging options, it is anticipated that the emphasis will be placed more than ever on cost-effectiveness on a population basis, as well as on segmental predictive accuracy in the individual subject.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17556171     DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  18 in total

1.  Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Joanne D Schuijf; William Wijns; J Wouter Jukema; Douwe E Atsma; Albert de Roos; Hildo J Lamb; Marcel P M Stokkel; Petra Dibbets-Schneider; Isabel Decramer; Pieter De Bondt; Ernst E van der Wall; Piet K Vanhoenacker; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology.

Authors:  Robert C Hendel; Manesh R Patel; Christopher M Kramer; Michael Poon; Robert C Hendel; James C Carr; Nancy A Gerstad; Linda D Gillam; John McB Hodgson; Raymond J Kim; Christopher M Kramer; John R Lesser; Edward T Martin; Joseph V Messer; Rita F Redberg; Geoffrey D Rubin; John S Rumsfeld; Allen J Taylor; Wm Guy Weigold; Pamela K Woodard; Ralph G Brindis; Robert C Hendel; Pamela S Douglas; Eric D Peterson; Michael J Wolk; Joseph M Allen; Manesh R Patel
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology.

Authors:  Matthew J Budoff; Stephan Achenbach; Roger S Blumenthal; J Jeffrey Carr; Jonathan G Goldin; Philip Greenland; Alan D Guerci; Joao A C Lima; Daniel J Rader; Geoffrey D Rubin; Leslee J Shaw; Susan E Wiegers
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Gabija Pundziute; Joanne D Schuijf; J Wouter Jukema; Eric Boersma; Albert de Roos; Ernst E van der Wall; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Stent thrombosis late after implantation of first-generation drug-eluting stents: a cause for concern.

Authors:  Edoardo Camenzind; P Gabriel Steg; William Wijns
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Late clinical events after clopidogrel discontinuation may limit the benefit of drug-eluting stents: an observational study of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents.

Authors:  Matthias Pfisterer; Hans Peter Brunner-La Rocca; Peter T Buser; Peter Rickenbacher; Patrick Hunziker; Christian Mueller; Raban Jeger; Franziska Bader; Stefan Osswald; Christoph Kaiser
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-11-02       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Reduction of coronary flow reserve in areas with and without ischemia on stress perfusion imaging in patients with coronary artery disease: a study using oxygen 15-labeled water PET.

Authors:  Keiichiro Yoshinaga; Chietsugu Katoh; Kazuyuki Noriyasu; Yasuyoshi Iwado; Hideto Furuyama; Yoshinori Ito; Yuji Kuge; Tetsuro Kohya; Akira Kitabatake; Nagara Tamaki
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Comparative use of radionuclide stress testing, coronary artery calcium scanning, and noninvasive coronary angiography for diagnostic and prognostic cardiac assessment.

Authors:  Daniel S Berman; Leslee J Shaw; Rory Hachamovitch; John D Friedman; Donna M Polk; Sean W Hayes; Louise E J Thomson; Guido Germano; Nathan D Wong; Xingping Kang; Alan Rozanski
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.446

9.  Analysis of coronary angioplasty practice in the United States with an insurance-claims data base.

Authors:  E J Topol; S G Ellis; D M Cosgrove; E R Bates; D W Muller; N J Schork; M A Schork; F D Loop
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Diagnostic accuracy of rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion imaging with hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the detection of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Uchechukwu K Sampson; Sharmila Dorbala; Atul Limaye; Raymond Kwong; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-02-26       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Relevance of Coronary Fractional Flow Reserve: Art-of-state.

Authors:  Yohanes Adiputra; Shao-Liang Chen
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.628

2.  Clinical Outcomes of patients with coronary artery disease who underwent FFR evaluation of intermediate coronary lesionS- COFFRS study.

Authors:  Srinivasa Prasad; S Harikrishnan; G Sanjay; S P Abhilash; S Bijulal; M Krishna Kumar; Jaganmohan Tharakan; V K Ajit Kumar
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2016-12-29

3.  Non-invasive computed tomography coronary angiography as a gatekeeper for invasive coronary angiography.

Authors:  Fleur R de Graaf; Joëlla E van Velzen; Stephanie M de Boer; Jacob M van Werkhoven; Lucia J Kroft; Albert de Roos; Allard Sieders; Greetje J de Grooth; J Wouter Jukema; Joanne D Schuijf; Jeroen J Bax; Martin J Schalij; Ernst E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  The role of FFR in clinical decision making in patients with moderate coronary lesions: a pilot study.

Authors:  Morteza Safi; Mohammad Ali Mehrabi; Saeed Alipour Parsa; Isa Khaheshi; Mohammadreza Naderian
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2018-10-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.