| Literature DB >> 17555591 |
Humayun Kabir1, Rukhsana Gazi, Ali Ashraf, Nirod Chandra Saha.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: During 1982-1992, the Maternal and Child Health Family Planning (MCH-FP) Extension Project (Rural) of International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (ICDDR,B), in partnership with the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW) of the Government of Bangladesh (GoB), implemented a series of interventions in Sirajganj Sadar sub-district of Sirajganj district. These interventions were aimed at improving the planning mechanisms and for reviewing the problem-solving processes to build an effective monitoring system of the interventions at the local level of the overall system of the MOHFW, GoB.Entities:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17555591 PMCID: PMC1899516 DOI: 10.1186/1478-4491-5-16
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Resour Health ISSN: 1478-4491
Observation of routine activities of Family Welfare Assistants (FWAs)
| Activity | 1995 | 1996 |
| Proportion of FWA who filled in the register | 96 | 99 |
| Proportion of FWA who used the checklists for client screening | 50 | 50 |
| Proportion of FWA who followed the recommended protocol during administering injectable contraceptive | 98 | 99 |
Cluster survey results of selected indicators of health and family-planning service use in Sirajgonj after the withdrawal of the interventions
| Indicator | After 1 year | After 2 year | Odds ratio |
| (1995) | (1996) | ||
| (n = 648) | (n = 775) | ||
| % | % | (95% CI) | |
| Couples desired no more children | 58 | 58 | 1.0 (0.80–1.24) |
| Unmet contraceptive need | 30 | 21 | 1.6 (1.25–2.06)** |
| Contraceptive prevalence rate | 40 | 53 | 0.59 (0.47–0.73)** |
| MWRA who had ever | |||
| Visited SC | 14 | 29 | 0.40 (0.30–0.53)** |
| Visited H&FWC | 34 | 42 | 0.71 (0.57–0.89)** |
| Received FWA visit within the last 2 months | 51 | 57 | 0.79 (0.63–0.98)** |
Results of 1995 (Referent)
**Statistically significant from 1 to 2 year(s) after the withdrawal of the interventions at 95% confidence interval, p < 0.05
CI = Confidence interval; FWA = Family Welfare Assistant;
H&FWC = Health and Family Welfare Centre; SC = Satellite Clinic
Comparison of selected indicators of health and family-planning service use between the national and the cluster survey
| National survey | Cluster | Odds ratio | |
| Indicator | (BDHS 1996–997) | survey | (95% CI) |
| (n = 8,450) | (1996) | ||
| % | (n = 775) | ||
| % | |||
| Couples desired no more children | 49.1 | 58 | 0.70 (0.60–0.81)** |
| Unmet contraceptive need | 16 | 21 | 0.72 (0.59–0.86)** |
| Contraceptive prevalence rate | 49 | 53 | 0.85 (0.73–0.99)** |
| MWRA who had ever | |||
| Visited SC | 20 | 29 | 0.61 (0.52–0.72)** |
| Visited H&FWC | - | 42 | |
| Received FWA visit within the last 2 months | 35 | 57 | 0.41 (0.35–0.47)** |
Data of BDHS 1996–1997 (Referent)
**Statistically significant difference found compared to the BDHS 1996–1997, after the withdrawal of the interventions at 95% confidence interval, p < 0.05
CI = Confidence interval; FWA = Family Welfare Assistant;
H&FWC = Health and Family Welfare Centre; SC = Satellite Clinic;
Data source: BDHS = Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 1996–97
Figure 1Method-specific contraceptive prevalence rate, by year, in Sirajgonj.