Literature DB >> 10112478

Management development for primary health care: a framework for analysis.

A Cassels1, K Janovsky.   

Abstract

Strengthening management has been widely promoted as a critical component of any strategy concerned with improving the implementation of primary health care (PHC). Management development programmes are, however, subject to conflicting demands and differing expectations. The situation is confounded by the wide diversity of strategies subsumed under the heading of management development, and the confusing nature of much of the terminology currently in use. This article presents a simple conceptual framework that can guide analysis and help programme planners review the options, opportunities and limitations of management development programmes. The framework presented examines management development from three different perspectives: the approach adopted; the outcomes expected; and the process of expansion, extension and adaptation. Our analysis of management development strategies allows us to reach some conclusions in areas where there is a degree of consensus. In countries where there is a mismatch between the strategies of PHC and the organizational structures through which they are to be implemented, management development has a role to play in effecting change. Its potential to do so is limited by powerful social, political, economic and organizational forces. Therefore, the capacity to critically analyse the context in which change is planned, emerges as a key element in programme design. We argue that there is no one best approach to management development, and the design of strategies will be contingent on a variety of factors. We do, however, reaffirm the view that where organizational structures and conditions do not support the implementation of PHC strategies, intervention through training alone is almost certain to be inadequate. To be effective, a more comprehensive programme will be required. Finally, the article points to a number of unresolved issues in areas where there is either controversy, lack of clarity or limited experience.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 10112478     DOI: 10.1002/hpm.4740060204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Plann Manage        ISSN: 0749-6753


  3 in total

1.  Learning from "the South".

Authors:  P Garner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-10-10

2.  Strengthening health system leadership for better governance: what does it take?

Authors:  Lucy Gilson; Irene Akua Agyepong
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 3.344

3.  Impact of an in-built monitoring system on family planning performance in rural Bangladesh.

Authors:  Humayun Kabir; Rukhsana Gazi; Ali Ashraf; Nirod Chandra Saha
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2007-06-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.