Literature DB >> 17554075

Ab initio modeling of glycosyl torsions and anomeric effects in a model carbohydrate: 2-ethoxy tetrahydropyran.

H Lee Woodcock1, Damian Moran, Richard W Pastor, Alexander D MacKerell, Bernard R Brooks.   

Abstract

A range of ab initio calculations were carried out on the axial and equatorial anomers of the model carbohydrate 2-ethoxy tetrahydropyran to evaluate the level of theory required to accurately evaluate the glycosyl dihedral angle and the anomeric ratio. Vacuum CCSD(T)/CBS extrapolations at the global minimum yield DeltaE = E(equatorial) - E(axial) = 1.42 kcal/mol. When corrected for solvent (by the IEFPCM model), zero-point vibrations and entropy, DeltaG(298) = 0.49 kcal/mol, in excellent agreement with the experimental value of 0.47 +/- 0.3 kcal/mol. A new additivity scheme, the layered composite method (LCM), yields DeltaE to within 0.1 kcal/mol of the CCSD(T)/CBS result at a fraction of the computer requirements. Anomeric ratios and one-dimensional torsional surfaces generated by LCM and the even more efficient MP2/cc-pVTZ level of theory are in excellent agreement, indicating that the latter is suitable for force-field parameterization of carbohydrates. Hartree-Fock and density functional theory differ from CCSD(T)/CBS for DeltaE by approximately 1 kcal/mol; they show similar deviations in torsional surfaces evaluated from LCM. A comparison of vacuum and solvent-corrected one- and two-dimensional torsional surfaces indicates the equatorial form of 2-ethoxy tetrahydropyran is more sensitive to solvent than the axial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17554075      PMCID: PMC1914444          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.106.099986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  5 in total

Review 1.  Advances in methods and algorithms in a modern quantum chemistry program package.

Authors:  Yihan Shao; Laszlo Fusti Molnar; Yousung Jung; Jörg Kussmann; Christian Ochsenfeld; Shawn T Brown; Andrew T B Gilbert; Lyudmila V Slipchenko; Sergey V Levchenko; Darragh P O'Neill; Robert A DiStasio; Rohini C Lochan; Tao Wang; Gregory J O Beran; Nicholas A Besley; John M Herbert; Ching Yeh Lin; Troy Van Voorhis; Siu Hung Chien; Alex Sodt; Ryan P Steele; Vitaly A Rassolov; Paul E Maslen; Prakashan P Korambath; Ross D Adamson; Brian Austin; Jon Baker; Edward F C Byrd; Holger Dachsel; Robert J Doerksen; Andreas Dreuw; Barry D Dunietz; Anthony D Dutoi; Thomas R Furlani; Steven R Gwaltney; Andreas Heyden; So Hirata; Chao-Ping Hsu; Gary Kedziora; Rustam Z Khalliulin; Phil Klunzinger; Aaron M Lee; Michael S Lee; Wanzhen Liang; Itay Lotan; Nikhil Nair; Baron Peters; Emil I Proynov; Piotr A Pieniazek; Young Min Rhee; Jim Ritchie; Edina Rosta; C David Sherrill; Andrew C Simmonett; Joseph E Subotnik; H Lee Woodcock; Weimin Zhang; Alexis T Bell; Arup K Chakraborty; Daniel M Chipman; Frerich J Keil; Arieh Warshel; Warren J Hehre; Henry F Schaefer; Jing Kong; Anna I Krylov; Peter M W Gill; Martin Head-Gordon
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 3.676

2.  Intrinsic conformational preferences of substituted cyclohexanes and tetrahydropyrans evaluated at the CCSD(T) complete basis set limit: implications for the anomeric effect.

Authors:  Abby Jones Weldon; Trisha L Vickrey; Gregory S Tschumper
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 2.781

3.  Comparative performance of MM3(92) and two TINKER MM3 versions for the modeling of carbohydrates.

Authors:  Carlos A Stortz
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  The correlation consistent composite approach (ccCA): an alternative to the Gaussian-n methods.

Authors:  Nathan J DeYonker; Thomas R Cundari; Angela K Wilson
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins.

Authors:  A D MacKerell; D Bashford; M Bellott; R L Dunbrack; J D Evanseck; M J Field; S Fischer; J Gao; H Guo; S Ha; D Joseph-McCarthy; L Kuchnir; K Kuczera; F T Lau; C Mattos; S Michnick; T Ngo; D T Nguyen; B Prodhom; W E Reiher; B Roux; M Schlenkrich; J C Smith; R Stote; J Straub; M Watanabe; J Wiórkiewicz-Kuczera; D Yin; M Karplus
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  1998-04-30       Impact factor: 2.991

  5 in total
  11 in total

1.  CHARMM additive all-atom force field for carbohydrate derivatives and its utility in polysaccharide and carbohydrate-protein modeling.

Authors:  Olgun Guvench; Sairam S Mallajosyula; E Prabhu Raman; Elizabeth Hatcher; Kenno Vanommeslaeghe; Theresa J Foster; Francis W Jamison; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Update of the CHARMM all-atom additive force field for lipids: validation on six lipid types.

Authors:  Jeffery B Klauda; Richard M Venable; J Alfredo Freites; Joseph W O'Connor; Douglas J Tobias; Carlos Mondragon-Ramirez; Igor Vorobyov; Alexander D MacKerell; Richard W Pastor
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  CHARMM Additive All-Atom Force Field for Glycosidic Linkages between Hexopyranoses.

Authors:  Olgun Guvench; Elizabeth R Hatcher; Richard M Venable; Richard W Pastor; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  The effect of electrostatic interactions on conformational equilibria of multiply substituted tetrahydropyran oxocarbenium ions.

Authors:  Michael T Yang; K A Woerpel
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 4.354

5.  CHARMM additive all-atom force field for aldopentofuranoses, methyl-aldopentofuranosides, and fructofuranose.

Authors:  Elizabeth Hatcher; Olgun Guvench; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  CHARMM general force field: A force field for drug-like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all-atom additive biological force fields.

Authors:  K Vanommeslaeghe; E Hatcher; C Acharya; S Kundu; S Zhong; J Shim; E Darian; O Guvench; P Lopes; I Vorobyov; A D Mackerell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.376

7.  Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone φ, ψ and side-chain χ(1) and χ(2) dihedral angles.

Authors:  Robert B Best; Xiao Zhu; Jihyun Shim; Pedro E M Lopes; Jeetain Mittal; Michael Feig; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Additive empirical force field for hexopyranose monosaccharides.

Authors:  Olgun Guvench; Shannon N Greene; Ganesh Kamath; John W Brady; Richard M Venable; Richard W Pastor; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2008-11-30       Impact factor: 3.376

9.  Pathways and populations: stereoelectronic insights into the exocyclic torsion of 5-(hydroxymethyl)tetrahydropyran.

Authors:  H Lee Woodcock; Bernard R Brooks; Richard W Pastor
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Importance of ligand conformational energies in carbohydrate docking: Sorting the wheat from the chaff.

Authors:  Anita K Nivedha; Spandana Makeneni; Bethany Lachele Foley; Matthew B Tessier; Robert J Woods
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2013-12-29       Impact factor: 3.376

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.