| Literature DB >> 17553170 |
Mehreen Zaki1, Jason King, Klaus Fütterer, Robert H Insall.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cell motility is an essential feature of the pathogenesis and morbidity of amoebiasis caused by Entamoeba histolytica. As motility depends on cytoskeletal organisation and regulation, a study of the molecular components involved is key to a better understanding of amoebic pathogenesis. However, little is known about the physiological roles, interactions and regulation of the proteins of the Entamoeba cytoskeleton.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17553170 PMCID: PMC1904233 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-8-28
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genet ISSN: 1471-2156 Impact factor: 2.797
Figure 1Comparison of Arp2 from . (A) Sequence alignment of Arp2 from D. discoideum (Dd) and E. histolytica (Eh). Dark shading represents identical residues and residues present in any one specie. Light shading represents conserved residues. Dashes are incorporated to optimise alignment. (B) Comparison of Dictyostelium Arp2 with the human, Saccharomyces and Entamoeba homologues. Numbers in () show percent identity (the proportion of identical amino acids over the full length of the aligned proteins expressed as a percentage). Numbers in [] show percent similarity (the proportion of both identical and conserved amino acids over the full length of the aligned proteins expressed as a percentage). (C) Key features of Arp2 from Dictyostelium and Entamoeba based on respective GenBank entries.
Figure 2Gene replacement using parasexual genetics. (A) Schematic representation of the method. (B) A scheme showing the genetics underlying the gene replacement method. (C) Western hybridisation screen for the gene replacement method. Banding patterns seen with Dictyostelium anti-Arp2 and mAb 9E10 anti-myc antibody are shown. Lane 1 shows the pattern seen for strains DH1, JH10, DIR1 and DJK45; lane 2 shows the pattern seen for strains DMZ10 and DMZ11; lane 3 shows the pattern for a haploid strain containing both wild-type and myc-tagged Arp2; lane 4 shows the pattern of the replacement strains MZ10 and MZ11.
Cell lines used in this work.
| HM-1:IMSS (clone 9) | HM-1:IMSS | Wild type | [49] | |
| AX3 | NC4 | Wild type | [44] | |
| DH1 | AX3 | Uracil auxotroph | [50] | |
| JH10 | AX3 | Thymidine auxotroph | [51] | |
| DIR1 | DH1/JH10 | Diploid between DH1 & JH10 ( | [17] | |
| DJK45 | DIR1 | Arp2 heterozygous diploid ( | This work | |
| DMZ10 | DJK45 + pJSK19 | Arp2 heterozygote expressing | pyr56-/Δ thyA::pyr56/wt | This work |
| DMZ11 | DJK45 + pMZ12 | Arp2 heterozygote expressing | This work | |
| MZ10 | DMZ10 | Thymidine dependent haploid rescued with replacement | This work | |
| MZ11 | DMZ11 | Thymidine dependent haploid rescued with replacement | This work |
Growth conditions of cell lines used in this work.
| HM-1:IMSS (clone 9) | Axenic medium LYI-S-2 |
| AX3 | Axenic medium HL-5 |
| DH1 | HL-5 supplemented with Uracil |
| JH10 | HL-5 supplemented with Thymidine |
| DIR1 | HL-5 |
| DJK45 | HL-5 (blasticidin optional) |
| DMZ10 | HL-5 supplemented with G418 (blasticidin optional) |
| DMZ11 | HL-5 supplemented with G418 (blasticidin optional) |
| MZ10 | HL-5 supplemented with Thymidine and G418 (blasticidin optional) |
| MZ11 | HL-5 supplemented with Thymidine and G418 (blasticidin optional) |
Segregation efficiency in axenic medium and on bacterial plates.
| 147/152 (96.7%) | 5/152 (3.3%) | 2/152 (1.3%) [2/5 (40%)] | |
| 3/36 (8.3%) | 10/36 (27.8%) | 6/36 (16.7%) [6/10 (60%)] |
Cells were segregated in axenic medium as described in Materials and Methods. Numbers are representative of three experiments.
Cells were segregated on bacterial plates as described in Materials and Methods. Numbers are representative of two experiments.
Numbers represent all haploids i.e. haploids with extra tagged copy of Arp2 and haploid replacements.
Numbers reflect haploid replacements expressed as a proportion of the total number of haploids ().
Figure 3Phenotypic analysis of replacement clones. (A) Growth in HL-5 medium in shaken flasks. (B) Protein expression in vegetative cells; (i) Cell lysates prepared from equal numbers of cells were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred onto nitrocellulose and immunoblotted as described in Materials and Methods. Blots were probed with Dictyostelium anti-Arp2 antibody. (ii) 20 μg of total protein was separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred onto PVDF and immunoblotted as described in Materials and Methods. Blots were probed with Dictyostelium anti-Arp2 and mAb 9E10 anti-myc antibodies. (C) All results are representative two to three experiments. Chemotaxis. Under-agar migratory response of cells to a gradient of folate. Arrows indicate the direction of cell migration (increasing folate concentration); (a) Scale bar is 50 μm. (a') Scale bar is 10 μm. Phototaxis. Response of cells spotted on nitrocellulose filters, to a lateral light source (48 hrs). The light source is always to the right of the image. Arrows indicate the direction of migration; (b) Scale bar is 5 mm. (b') Scale bar is 1 mm. Development. Fruiting body morphology of cells after development on nitrocellulose filters (48 hrs). (c) Scale bar is 1 mm. (c') Scale bar is 0.1 mm.
Figure 4Immunoprecipitation. Washed, pelleted beads with bound mAb 9E10 and immunoprecipitated proteins were analysed by SDS-PAGE and western blotting as described in Materials and Methods. Cell lysates (L) and immunoprecipitates (IP) from three Dictyostelium cell types were examined; AX3 (wild type), MZ10 (haploid rescued with myc-tagged Dictyostelium Arp2 replacement), MZ11 (haploid rescued with myc-tagged Entamoeba Arp2 replacement). Blots were probed with antibodies to Dictyostelium Arp2, Arp3 and the p21-arc subunits.