Literature DB >> 17552953

Comparison of a 3-day with a 1-day regimen of an extended-release formulation of ciprofloxacin as antimicrobial prophylaxis for patients undergoing transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate.

Anthony J Schaeffer1, Francesco Montorsi, Vincenzo Scattoni, Renee Perroncel, James Song, Daniel C Haverstock, Peter E Pertel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical and bacteriological efficacy and the clinical safety of a 1-day with a 3-day regimen of an extended-release formulation of ciprofloxacin (ciprofloxacin XR) given as antimicrobial prophylaxis to men undergoing transrectal needle biopsy of the prostate (TRNBP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicentre, prospective, international, double-blind study in patients who required TRNBP. Patients were randomized to receive oral ciprofloxacin XR 1000 mg as either a 1-day or a 3-day regimen. Single doses were given at 24 h before, 2-3 h before, and 24 h after TRNBP. Patients in the 1-day regimen had placebo instead of the first and third doses of ciprofloxacin.
RESULTS: Of 497 patients enrolled, 247 were randomized to 1-day ciprofloxacin XR and 250 to the 3-day regimen. In the population valid for microbiological efficacy, the final assessment identified bacteriological success (primary efficacy endpoint) in more patients who had the 3-day regimen (98%) than in those who received the 1-day regimen (94.8%, 95% confidence interval, CI, - 6.1%, 0.8%), although the difference was not statistically significant. In this population, the clinical response at the final visit was 98.5% and 96.7% for patients receiving the 3-day and the 1-day regimens, respectively (95% CI - 5.2%, 0.8%). However, in the clinical efficacy population the clinical success rate was significantly greater for the 3-day (99.0%) than for the 1-day regimen (95.8%; 95% CI - 6.4%, - 0.3%). In a multivariate analysis, patients with diabetes mellitus and patients with a history of prostatitis had higher microbiological and clinical failure rates, respectively, than those without such conditions. For these patients, all failures occurred among those treated with the 1-day regimen.
CONCLUSION: As defined by bacteriological success in the population assessed for microbiological efficacy, prophylaxis with one dose of ciprofloxacin XR was statistically no worse than a 3-day regimen. However, in all efficacy analyses, bacteriological and clinical success rates were consistently lower for the 1-day than for the 3-day treatment. Thus, for selected patients undergoing TRNBP, there might be a role for 3-day preventive therapy with ciprofloxacin XR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17552953     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06848.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  10 in total

1.  Quality improvement initiative to reduce variability and improve stewardship of antimicrobial prophylaxis for transrectal prostate needle biopsy.

Authors:  Pedro Recabal; Taehyoung Lee; Emily Vertosick; Michael Manasia; James Eastham; Karim Touijer; Susan K Seo; Massimiliano Spaliviero; Behfar Ehdaie
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in the era of increasing fluoroquinolone resistance: prophylaxis with single-dose ertapenem.

Authors:  Michael Seitz; Christian Stief; Raphaela Waidelich; Markus Bader; Derya Tilki
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Fluoroquinolone-resistant acute prostatitis requiring hospitalization after transrectal prostate biopsy: effect of previous fluoroquinolone use as prophylaxis or long-term treatment.

Authors:  Sinan Ekici; Melahat Cengiz; Güven Turan; Esra Ergün Alış
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Effect of needle size on cancer detection, pain, bleeding and infection in TRUS-guided prostate biopsies: A prospective trial.

Authors:  Michael McCormack; Alain Duclos; Mathieu Latour; Marie Hélène McCormack; Daniel Liberman; Orchidee Djahangirian; Josette Bergeron; Luc Valiquette; Kevin Zorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Comparison between ciprofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Doğan Atılgan; Yusuf Gençten; Engin Kölükçü; Şahin Kılıç; Nihat Uluocak; Bekir Süha Parlaktaş; Fikret Erdemir
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-03

6.  Short term outcomes of prostate biopsy in men tested for cancer by prostate specific antigen: prospective evaluation within ProtecT study.

Authors:  Derek J Rosario; J Athene Lane; Chris Metcalfe; Jenny L Donovan; Andy Doble; Louise Goodwin; Michael Davis; James W F Catto; Kerry Avery; David E Neal; Freddie C Hamdy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-01-09

7.  Oral antibiotics in trans-rectal prostate biopsy and its efficacy to reduce infectious complications: Systematic review.

Authors:  Mohand Deeb Yaghi; E O Kehinde
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2015-10-14

Review 8.  Strategies for prevention of ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy infections.

Authors:  Diane D Lu; Jay D Raman
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Assessment of Guideline Discordance With Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Best Practices for Common Urologic Procedures.

Authors:  Chelsea Khaw; Anthony D Oberle; Brian C Lund; Jason Egge; Brett H Heintz; Bradley A Erickson; Daniel J Livorsi
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-12-07

Review 10.  Guidelines for Transrectal Ultrasonography-Guided Prostate Biopsy: Korean Society of Urogenital Radiology Consensus Statement for Patient Preparation, Standard Technique, and Biopsy-Related Pain Management.

Authors:  Myoung Seok Lee; Min Hoan Moon; Chan Kyo Kim; Sung Yoon Park; Moon Hyung Choi; Sung Il Jung
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.500

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.