Literature DB >> 17552716

Psychophysical estimates of level-dependent best-frequency shifts in the apical region of the human basilar membrane.

Enrique A Lopez-Poveda1, Luis F Barrios, Ana Alves-Pinto.   

Abstract

It is now undisputed that the best frequency (BF) of basal basilar-membrane (BM) sites shifts downwards as the stimulus level increases. The direction of the shift for apical sites is, by contrast, less well established. Auditory nerve studies suggest that the BF shifts in opposite directions for apical and basal BM sites with increasing stimulus level. This study attempts to determine if this is the case in humans. Psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) were measured using forward masking for probe frequencies of 125, 250, 500, and 6000 Hz. The level of a masker tone required to just mask a fixed low-level probe tone was measured for different masker-probe time intervals. The duration of the intervals was adjusted as necessary to obtain PTCs for the widest possible range of masker levels. The BF was identified from function fits to the measured PTCs and it almost always decreased with increasing level. This result is inconsistent with most auditory-nerve observations obtained from other mammals. Several explanations are discussed, including that it may be erroneous to assume that low-frequency PTCs reflect the tuning of apical BM sites exclusively and that the inherent frequency response of the inner hair cell may account for the discrepancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17552716     DOI: 10.1121/1.2722046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Isoresponse versus isoinput estimates of cochlear filter tuning.

Authors:  Almudena Eustaquio-Martín; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-23

2.  Pitfalls in behavioral estimates of basilar-membrane compression in humans.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Contralateral efferent reflex effects on threshold and suprathreshold psychoacoustical tuning curves at low and high frequencies.

Authors:  Enzo Aguilar; Almudena Eustaquio-Martin; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-20

4.  Tone-burst auditory brainstem response wave V latencies in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Judy Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Kendra K Schmid; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Auditory filter tuning inferred with short sinusoidal and notched-noise maskers.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  On the controversy about the sharpness of human cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Enrique A Lopez-Poveda; Almudena Eustaquio-Martin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-21

7.  Auditory nerve frequency tuning measured with forward-masked compound action potentials.

Authors:  Eric Verschooten; Luis Robles; Damir Kovačić; Philip X Joris
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-05

8.  Compensating Level-Dependent Frequency Representation in Auditory Cortex by Synaptic Integration of Corticocortical Input.

Authors:  Max F K Happel; Frank W Ohl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.