AIM: To study the correlations of Pancreas duodenal homeobox-1 with pancreatic cancer characteristics, including pathological grading, TNM grading, tumor metastasis and tumor cell proliferation. METHODS: Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to detect PDX-1 mRNA expression in pancreatic cancer tissue and normal pancreatic tissue. The expression of PDX-1 protein was measured by Western blot and immunohistochemistry. Immunohistochemistry was also used to detect proliferative cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Correlations of PDX-1 with pancreatic cancer characteristics, including pathological grading, TNM grading, tumor metastasis and tumor cell proliferation, were analyzed by using c2 test. RESULTS: Immunohistochemistry showed that 41.1% of pancreatic cancers were positive for PDX-1 expression, but normal pancreatic tissue except islets showed no staining for PDX-1. In consistent with the result of imunohistochemistry, Western blot showed that 37.5% of pancreatic cancers were positive for PDX-1. RT-PCR showed that PDX-1 expression was significantly higher in pancreatic cancer tissues than normal pancreatic tissues (2(-3.56 +/- 0.35) vs 2(-8.76 +/- 0.14), P < 0.01). Lymph node metastasis (P < 0.01), TNM grading (P < 0.05), pathological grading (P < 0.05) and tumor cell proliferation (P < 0.01) were significantly correlated with PDX-1 expression levels. CONCLUSION: PDX-1 is re-expressed in pancreatic cancer, and PDX-1-positive pancreatic cancer cells show more malignant potential compared to PDX-1-negative cells. Therefore, PDX-1-positive cells may be tumor stem cells and PDX-1 may act as alternate surface marker of pancreatic cancer stem cells.
AIM: To study the correlations of Pancreas duodenal homeobox-1 with pancreatic cancer characteristics, including pathological grading, TNM grading, tumor metastasis and tumor cell proliferation. METHODS: Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to detect PDX-1 mRNA expression in pancreatic cancer tissue and normal pancreatic tissue. The expression of PDX-1 protein was measured by Western blot and immunohistochemistry. Immunohistochemistry was also used to detect proliferative cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Correlations of PDX-1 with pancreatic cancer characteristics, including pathological grading, TNM grading, tumor metastasis and tumor cell proliferation, were analyzed by using c2 test. RESULTS: Immunohistochemistry showed that 41.1% of pancreatic cancers were positive for PDX-1 expression, but normal pancreatic tissue except islets showed no staining for PDX-1. In consistent with the result of imunohistochemistry, Western blot showed that 37.5% of pancreatic cancers were positive for PDX-1. RT-PCR showed that PDX-1 expression was significantly higher in pancreatic cancer tissues than normal pancreatic tissues (2(-3.56 +/- 0.35) vs 2(-8.76 +/- 0.14), P < 0.01). Lymph node metastasis (P < 0.01), TNM grading (P < 0.05), pathological grading (P < 0.05) and tumor cell proliferation (P < 0.01) were significantly correlated with PDX-1 expression levels. CONCLUSION:PDX-1 is re-expressed in pancreatic cancer, and PDX-1-positive pancreatic cancer cells show more malignant potential compared to PDX-1-negative cells. Therefore, PDX-1-positive cells may be tumor stem cells and PDX-1 may act as alternate surface marker of pancreatic cancer stem cells.
Authors: Muhammad Al-Hajj; Max S Wicha; Adalberto Benito-Hernandez; Sean J Morrison; Michael F Clarke Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-03-10 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Andrew J Aguirre; Nabeel Bardeesy; Manisha Sinha; Lyle Lopez; David A Tuveson; James Horner; Mark S Redston; Ronald A DePinho Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2003-12-17 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Yoshiharu Miyamoto; Anirban Maitra; Bidyut Ghosh; Ulrich Zechner; Pedram Argani; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue; Virote Sriuranpong; Tatsuya Iso; Ingrid M Meszoely; Michael S Wolfe; Ralph H Hruban; Douglas W Ball; Roland M Schmid; Steven D Leach Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Sheila K Singh; Ian D Clarke; Mizuhiko Terasaki; Victoria E Bonn; Cynthia Hawkins; Jeremy Squire; Peter B Dirks Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2003-09-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Guisheng Zhou; Shi-He Liu; Kelly M Shahi; Hua Wang; Xueyan Duan; Xia Lin; Xin-Hua Feng; Min Li; William E Fisher; Francesco J Demayo; David Dawson; F Charles Brunicardi Journal: Mol Endocrinol Date: 2012-06-05
Authors: G Zhou; J Yu; A Wang; S-H Liu; J Sinnett-Smith; J Wu; R Sanchez; J Nemunaitis; C Ricordi; E Rozengurt; F C Brunicardi Journal: Curr Mol Med Date: 2016 Impact factor: 2.222
Authors: Courtney J Balentine; David H Berger; Shi-He Liu; Changyi Chen; John Nemunaitis; F Charles Brunicardi Journal: World J Surg Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: J Wu; S Liu; J Yu; G Zhou; D Rao; C M Jay; P Kumar; R Sanchez; N Templeton; N Senzer; P Maples; J Nemunaitis; F C Brunicardi Journal: Cancer Gene Ther Date: 2014-01-24 Impact factor: 5.987
Authors: Thomas S Frank; Xiaotian Sun; Yuqing Zhang; Jingxuan Yang; William E Fisher; Marie-Claude Gingras; Min Li Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 8.679
Authors: Jason Y Park; Seung-Mo Hong; David S Klimstra; Michael G Goggins; Anirban Maitra; Ralph H Hruban Journal: Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol Date: 2011-10
Authors: Shi-He Liu; Sanjeet Patel; Marie-Claude Gingras; John Nemunaitis; Guisheng Zhou; Changyi Chen; Min Li; William Fisher; Richard Gibbs; F Charles Brunicardi Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-09-30 Impact factor: 6.860