Literature DB >> 17550182

The effects of low- and high-frequency suppressors on psychophysical estimates of basilar-membrane compression and gain.

Ifat Yasin1, Christopher J Plack.   

Abstract

Physiological studies suggest that the increase in suppression as a function of suppressor level is greater for a suppressor below than above the signal frequency. This study investigated the pattern of gain reduction underlying this increase in suppression. Temporal masking curves (TMCs) were obtained by measuring the level of a 2.2-kHz sinusoidal off-frequency masker or 4-kHz on-frequency sinusoidal masker required to mask a brief 4-kHz sinusoidal signal at 10 dB SL, for masker-signal intervals of 20-100 ms. TMCs were also obtained in the presence of a 3- or 4.75-kHz sinusoidal suppressor gated with the 4-kHz masker, for suppressor levels of 40-70 dB SPL. The decrease in gain (increase in suppression) as a function of suppressor level was greater with a 3-kHz suppressor than with a 4.75-kHz suppressor, in line with previous findings. Basilar membrane input-output (I/O) functions derived from the TMCs showed a shift to higher input (4-kHz masker) levels of the low-level (linear) portion of the I/O function with the addition of a suppressor, with partial linearization of the function, but no reduction in maximum compression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17550182     DOI: 10.1121/1.2713675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  4 in total

1.  The relationship between precursor level and the temporal effect.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The effects of preceding sound and stimulus duration on measures of suppression in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Erica L Hegland; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Two-tone suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; John C Ellison; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Is off-frequency overshoot caused by adaptation of suppression?

Authors:  Mark Fletcher; Jessica de Boer; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.