Literature DB >> 17550167

Noise in the operating rooms of Johns Hopkins Hospital.

Jonathan M Kracht1, Ilene J Busch-Vishniac, James E West.   

Abstract

Very little reliable information exists on the sound levels present in an operating room environment. To remedy this situation, sound pressure levels of the operating rooms in Johns Hopkins Hospital were monitored before, during, and after operations. The data were analyzed to determine background sound levels, average equivalent sound levels L(eq), frequency distribution, and peak sound pressure levels L(peak). Each surgery was matched to the period of noise it produced permitting the association of sound levels with particular types of surgeries and the determination of various sound measures for classes of surgery (e.g., orthopedic, neurological, etc.). Averaging over many surgeries, orthopedic surgery was found to have the highest L(eq) at approximately 66 dB(A). Neurosurgery, urology, cardiology, and gastrointestinal surgery followed closely, ranging from 62 to 65 dB(A). By considering the L(peak) along with the L(eq) values, a pattern emerges for the various surgical divisions. Gastrointestinal and thoracic surgery are relatively quiet among the surgical divisions. Neurosurgery and orthopedics have sustained high sound levels. Cardiology surgery has a more moderate average sound level but includes brief periods of extremely high peak sound levels. For neurosurgery and orthopedic surgery, peak levels exceeded 100 dB over 40% of the time. The highest peak levels routinely seen during surgery were well in excess of 120 dB.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17550167     DOI: 10.1121/1.2714921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Hazard assessment and occupational safety measures in surgery : Relevant knowledge on occupational medicine].

Authors:  S Darius; F Meyer; I Böckelmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Intraoperative Acoustics: Auditory Cues in Hip Reconstructive Surgery.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Henstenburg; Walaa Abdelfadeel; Anthony J Boniello; Joseph Schmitz; Jeffrey J Vakil; Andrew M Star
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2022-07

3.  Effects of divided attention and operating room noise on perception of pulse oximeter pitch changes: a laboratory study.

Authors:  Ryan A Stevenson; Joseph J Schlesinger; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  A cross-sectional study in a tertiary care hospital in China: noise or silence in the operating room.

Authors:  Xiaoxiao Wang; Lin Zeng; Gang Li; Mao Xu; Bin Wei; Yan Li; Nan Li; Liyuan Tao; Hua Zhang; Xiangyang Guo; Yiming Zhao
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Factors Affecting Acoustics and Speech Intelligibility in the Operating Room: Size Matters.

Authors:  Richard R McNeer; Christopher L Bennett; Danielle Bodzin Horn; Roman Dudaryk
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Modifications of Surgical Suction Tip Geometry for Flow Optimisation: Influence on Suction-Induced Noise Pollution.

Authors:  M G Friedrich; T Tirilomis; J M Kollmeier; Y Wang; G G Hanekop
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2018-11-21

Review 7.  Noise in Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery operating rooms: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gianluca Sampieri; Amirpouyan Namavarian; Vincent Lin; John Lee; Marc Levin; Justine Philteos; Jong Wook Lee; Anni Koskinen
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-02-11

8.  Distractions in the operating room: a survey of the healthcare team.

Authors:  Bao-Ngoc Nasri; John D Mitchell; Cullen Jackson; Keitaro Nakamoto; Charlotte Guglielmi; Daniel B Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 3.453

9.  Occupational exposures in the operating room: Are surgeons well-equipped?

Authors:  Wilmina N Landford; Ledibabari M Ngaage; Erica Lee; Yvonne Rasko; Robin Yang; Sheri Slezak; Richard Redett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The impact of neurosurgical procedure on cognitive resources: Results of bypass training.

Authors:  Antti Huotarinen; Mika Niemelä; Ahmad Hafez
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2018-04-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.