Literature DB >> 36032637

Intraoperative Acoustics: Auditory Cues in Hip Reconstructive Surgery.

Jeffrey M Henstenburg1, Walaa Abdelfadeel1, Anthony J Boniello1, Joseph Schmitz2, Jeffrey J Vakil1, Andrew M Star1.   

Abstract

Background: Orthopaedic surgeons rely on visual and tactile cues to guide performance in the operating room (OR). However, there is very little data on how sound changes during orthopaedic procedures and how surgeons incorporate audio feedback to guide performance. This study attempts to define meaningful changes in sound during vital aspects of total hip arthroplasty (THA) within the spectrum of human hearing.
Methods: 84 audio recordings were obtained during primary elective THA procedures during sawing of the femoral neck, reaming of the acetabulum, acetabular cup impaction, polyethylene liner impaction, femoral broaching, planning of the femoral calcar and press-fit of a porous-coated stem in 14 patients. We graphed changes in frequency intensity across the human spectrum of hearing and sampled frequencies showing differences over time for statistically meaningful changes.
Results: Sawing of the femoral neck, polyethylene impaction, and stem insertion showed significant temporal increases in overall sound intensity. Calcar planing showed a significant decrease in sound intensity. Moreover, spectrographic analysis showed that, for each of the critical tasks in THA, there were characteristic frequencies that showed maximal changes in loudness. These changes were above the 1 dB change in intensity required for detection by the human ear.
Conclusion: Our results clearly demonstrate reproducible sound changes during total hip arthroplasty that are detectable by the human ear. Surgeons can incorporate sound as a valuable source of feedback while performing total hip arthroplasty to guide optimal performance in the OR. These findings can be extrapolated to other orthopaedic procedures that produce characteristic changes in sound. Moreover, it emphasizes the importance of limiting ambient noise in the OR that might make sound changes hard to distinguish.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustics; Arthroplasty; Hip; Performance; Sound

Year:  2022        PMID: 36032637      PMCID: PMC9382252          DOI: 10.22038/ABJS.2021.53669.2669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg        ISSN: 2345-461X


  21 in total

1.  Occupational noise levels in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  H Mullett; K Synnott; W Quinlan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1999 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Noise exposure in the orthopaedic operating theatre: a significant health hazard.

Authors:  Hamish Love
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.872

3.  Orthopaedic theatre noise: a potential hazard to patients.

Authors:  M R Nott; P D B West
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Mead C Killion; Patricia A Niquette; Gail I Gudmundsen; Lawrence J Revit; Shilpi Banerjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Drilling sounds are used by surgeons and intermediate residents, but not novice orthopedic trainees, to guide drilling motions.

Authors:  Monate Praamsma; Heather Carnahan; David Backstein; Christian J H Veillette; David Gonzalez; Adam Dubrowski
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Hammering sound frequency analysis and prevention of intraoperative periprosthetic fractures during total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rina Sakai; Aki Kikuchi; Towa Morita; Naonobu Takahira; Katsufumi Uchiyama; Takeaki Yamamoto; Mistutoshi Moriya; Kentaro Uchida; Kensuke Fukushima; Kensei Tanaka; Masashi Takaso; Moritoshi Itoman; Kiyoshi Mabuchi
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.135

7.  Noise pollution in the anaesthetic and intensive care environment.

Authors:  P C Kam; A C Kam; J F Thompson
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 6.955

8.  Orthopaedic theatres: a possible noise hazard?

Authors:  S A Kamal
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 1.469

9.  Effect of noise on auditory processing in the operating room.

Authors:  T Justin Way; Ashleigh Long; Jeff Weihing; Rosalind Ritchie; Raleigh Jones; Matthew Bush; Jennifer B Shinn
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Acoustic pattern evaluation during cementless hip arthroplasty surgery may be a new method for predicting complications.

Authors:  Itaru Morohashi; Hideaki Iwase; Akio Kanda; Taichi Sato; Yasuhiro Homma; Atsuhiko Mogami; Osamu Obayashi; Kazuo Kaneko
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2017-02-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.