Literature DB >> 17547656

During measurements of root hydraulics with pressure probes, the contribution of unstirred layers is minimized in the pressure relaxation mode: comparison with pressure clamp and high-pressure flowmeter.

Thorsten Knipfer1, Debasish Das, Ernst Steudle.   

Abstract

The effects of unstirred layers (USLs) at the endodermis of roots of young maize plants (Zea mays L.) were quantified, when measuring the water permeability of roots using a root pressure probe (RPP) in the pressure relaxation (PR) and pressure clamp (PC) modes. Different from PRs, PCs were performed by applying a constant pressure for certain periods of time. Experimental data were compared with results from simulations based on a convection versus diffusion (C/D) model, with the endodermis being the main barrier for solutes and water. Solute profiles in the stele were calculated as they occurred during rapid water flows across the root. The model quantitatively predicted the experimental finding of two distinct phases during PRs, in terms of a build-up of concentration profiles in the stele between endodermis and xylem vessels. It also predicted that, following a PC, half-times (T1/2) of PRs increased as the time used for clamping (and the build-up of USLs) increased. Following PCs of durations of 15, 30 and 60 s, T1/2 increased by factors of between 2.5 and 7.0, and water permeability of roots (root hydraulic conductivity, Lpr) was reduced by the same factors. When root pressure was immediately taken back to the original equilibrium root pressure following a PC, there was a transient uptake of water into the root stele (transient increase of root pressure), and the size of transients rose with time of clamping, as predicted by the model. The results indicated that the 'real' hydraulic conductivity of roots should be measured during initial water flows, such as during the rapid phase of PRs, when the effect of USLs was minimized. It was discussed that 'pressure-propagation effects' could not explain the finding of two phases during PRs. The results of USL effects threw some doubt on the use of PC and high-pressure flowmeter (HPFM) techniques with roots, where rigorous estimates of USLs were still missing despite the fact that large quantities of water were forced across the root.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17547656     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01670.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell Environ        ISSN: 0140-7791            Impact factor:   7.228


  11 in total

1.  The role of plasma membrane intrinsic protein aquaporins in water transport through roots: diurnal and drought stress responses reveal different strategies between isohydric and anisohydric cultivars of grapevine.

Authors:  Rebecca K Vandeleur; Gwenda Mayo; Megan C Shelden; Matthew Gilliham; Brent N Kaiser; Stephen D Tyerman
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Differential responses of grapevine rootstocks to water stress are associated with adjustments in fine root hydraulic physiology and suberization.

Authors:  F H Barrios-Masias; T Knipfer; A J McElrone
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 6.992

3.  Going with the Flow: Multiscale Insights into the Composite Nature of Water Transport in Roots.

Authors:  Valentin Couvreur; Marc Faget; Guillaume Lobet; Mathieu Javaux; François Chaumont; Xavier Draye
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Permeability of Iris germanica's multiseriate exodermis to water, NaCl, and ethanol.

Authors:  Chris J Meyer; Carol A Peterson; Ernst Steudle
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 6.992

5.  Water and solute permeabilities of Arabidopsis roots in relation to the amount and composition of aliphatic suberin.

Authors:  Kosala Ranathunge; Lukas Schreiber
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.992

6.  Water uptake by seminal and adventitious roots in relation to whole-plant water flow in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.).

Authors:  Thorsten Knipfer; Wieland Fricke
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 6.992

7.  The composite water and solute transport of barley (Hordeum vulgare) roots: effect of suberized barriers.

Authors:  Kosala Ranathunge; Yangmin X Kim; Friedrich Wassmann; Tino Kreszies; Viktoria Zeisler; Lukas Schreiber
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 8.  Composite Transport Model and Water and Solute Transport across Plant Roots: An Update.

Authors:  Yangmin X Kim; Kosala Ranathunge; Seulbi Lee; Yejin Lee; Deogbae Lee; Jwakyung Sung
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Root hydraulic conductivity measured by pressure clamp is substantially affected by internal unstirred layers.

Authors:  Thorsten Knipfer; Ernst Steudle
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 10.  Flowers under pressure: ins and outs of turgor regulation in development.

Authors:  Léna Beauzamy; Naomi Nakayama; Arezki Boudaoud
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 4.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.