Literature DB >> 17546741

Defining task-set reconfiguration: the case of reference point switching.

Darryl W Schneider1, Gordon D Logan.   

Abstract

Some researchers argue that task switching involves task-set reconfiguration--that is, changing the existing task set to perform a different task. Although this idea is intriguing, it is often unclear what is reconfigured and which processes are involved in reconfiguration. We addressed these issues by defining task sets, identifying differences between them, and obtaining evidence that was diagnostic of reconfiguration. In two experiments, subjects performed relative judgment tasks that involved comparing a target with a reference point that repeated or switched across trials. The task was the same on every trial, but the task set was not, because a task-set parameter--the reference point--had to be changed. Target-reference point distance effects that changed with the reference point provided diagnostic evidence that reconfiguration occurred, and this reconfiguration led to switch costs. We discuss how our approach can be generalized to define reconfiguration more clearly in other task-switching situations.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17546741     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  11 in total

1.  Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations.

Authors:  G D Logan; R D Gordon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Task switching.

Authors:  Stephen Monsell
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Task-switching and long-term priming: role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs.

Authors:  Florian Waszak; Bernhard Hommel; Alan Allport
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Clever homunculus: is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure?

Authors:  Gordon D Logan; Claus Bundesen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Episodic and semantic components of the compound-stimulus strategy in the explicit task-cuing procedure.

Authors:  Catherine M Arrington; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-09

6.  Modeling task switching without switching tasks: a short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-08

7.  Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process?

Authors:  Stephen Monsell; Guy A Mizon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The time it takes to switch attention.

Authors:  Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-08

9.  The psychophysics of numerical comparison: a reexamination of apparently incompatible data.

Authors:  S Dehaene
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-06

10.  Comparisons of digits and dot patterns.

Authors:  P B Buckley; C B Gillman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1974-12
View more
  4 in total

1.  On the automaticity of relational stimulus processing.

Authors:  Niclas Heider; Adriaan Spruyt; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-02

2.  A memory-based model of Hick's law.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; John R Anderson
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  The effects of stimulus-driven competition and task set on involuntary attention.

Authors:  Suk Won Han; René Marois
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Does white matter matter? Spatio-temporal dynamics of task switching in aging.

Authors:  Gabriele Gratton; Emily Wee; Elena I Rykhlevskaia; Echo E Leaver; Monica Fabiani
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.225

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.