Literature DB >> 17546708

Impact of chromosomal abnormalities on preimplantation embryo development.

Carmen Rubio1, Lorena Rodrigo, Amparo Mercader, Emilia Mateu, Pilar Buendía, Tugce Pehlivan, Thamara Viloria, Ma José De los Santos, Carlos Simón, José Remohí, Antonio Pellicer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of numerical chromosomal abnormalities on preimplantation embryo development.
METHODS: This study includes 6936 embryos from 1245 women undergoing preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). Indications for aneuploidy screening were: recurrent miscarriages, implantation failure, severe male factor, advanced maternal age, and mixed causes. Embryo biopsy was performed on day 3, and embryos were co-cultured until day 5, when embryo transfer was performed.
RESULTS: In the aneuploidy screening regimen, normal euploid embryos showed significantly higher blastocyst rates (68.2%) compared to chromosomally abnormal (42.8%, p < 0.0001) and mosaic (53.7%, p < 0.0001) embryos. Among aneuploid embryos for autosomes, higher blastocyst rates were observed in trisomies than monosomies, although only statistically significant in patients over 36 years of age (50.8 vs 38.9%; p < 0.0001). In contrast, in embryos with sex chromosomes aneuploidy, similar blastocyst rates were observed between trisomies and monosomy X.
CONCLUSION: Embryos with certain types of chromosomal abnormalities were negatively selected during preimplantation embryo development. Despite this selection, a remarkable percentage of chromosomally abnormal embryos can develop normally to blastocyst stage with high probability of implantation and pregnancy. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17546708     DOI: 10.1002/pd.1773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  31 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for the design, analysis and interpretation of 'omics' data: focus on human endometrium.

Authors:  Signe Altmäe; Francisco J Esteban; Anneli Stavreus-Evers; Carlos Simón; Linda Giudice; Bruce A Lessey; Jose A Horcajadas; Nick S Macklon; Thomas D'Hooghe; Cristina Campoy; Bart C Fauser; Lois A Salamonsen; Andres Salumets
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2013-09-29       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 2.  PGS-FISH in reproductive medicine and perspective directions for improvement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sandra Zamora; Ana Clavero; M Carmen Gonzalvo; Juan de Dios Luna Del Castillo; Jose Antonio Roldán-Nofuentes; Juan Mozas; Jose Antonio Castilla
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  False positive rate of an arrayCGH platform for single-cell preimplantation genetic screening and subsequent clinical application on day-3.

Authors:  Pere Mir; Lorena Rodrigo; Amparo Mercader; Pilar Buendía; Emilia Mateu; Miguel Milán-Sánchez; Vanessa Peinado; Antonio Pellicer; Jose Remohí; Carlos Simón; Carmen Rubio
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Natural selection between day 3 and day 5/6 PGD embryos in couples with reciprocal or Robertsonian translocations.

Authors:  Claire E Beyer; E Willats
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  The mechanisms and clinical application of mosaicism in preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  Xinyuan Li; Yan Hao; Nagwa Elshewy; Xiaoqian Zhu; Zhiguo Zhang; Ping Zhou
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  The origin and impact of embryonic aneuploidy.

Authors:  Elpida Fragouli; Samer Alfarawati; Katharina Spath; Souraya Jaroudi; Jonas Sarasa; Maria Enciso; Dagan Wells
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Tripolar chromosome segregation drives the association between maternal genotype at variants spanning PLK4 and aneuploidy in human preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  Rajiv C McCoy; Louise J Newnham; Christian S Ottolini; Eva R Hoffmann; Katerina Chatzimeletiou; Omar E Cornejo; Qiansheng Zhan; Nikica Zaninovic; Zev Rosenwaks; Dmitri A Petrov; Zachary P Demko; Styrmir Sigurjonsson; Alan H Handyside
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2018-07-15       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  Two different microarray technologies for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening, due to reciprocal translocation imbalances, demonstrate equivalent euploidy and clinical pregnancy rates.

Authors:  Kyle J Tobler; Paul R Brezina; Andrew T Benner; Luke Du; Xin Xu; William G Kearns
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Maternal enzyme masks the phenotype of mouse embryos lacking dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Mark Johnson; Pa Vang; Jessica Filipovits; David Gardner
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.828

10.  Building a model to increase live birth rate through patient-specific optimization of embryo transfer day.

Authors:  R H Goldman; D J Kaser; S A Missmer; S S Srouji; L V Farland; C Racowsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.