PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were 1) derive allometric scaling models of isometric biceps muscle strength using pretraining body mass (BM) and muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) as scaling variables in adult males, 2) test model appropriateness using regression diagnostics, and 3) cross-validate the models before and after 12 wk of resistance training. METHODS: A subset of FAMuSS (Functional SNP Associated with Muscle Size and Strength) study data (N=136) were randomly split into two groups (A and B). Allometric scaling models using pretraining BM and CSA were derived and tested for group A. The scaling exponents determined from these models were then applied to and tested on group B pretraining data. Finally, these scaling exponents were applied to and tested on group A and B posttraining data. RESULTS: BM and CSA models produced scaling exponents of 0.64 and 0.71, respectively. Regression diagnostics determined both models to be appropriate. Cross-validation of the models to group B showed that the BM model, but not the CSA model, was appropriate. Removal of the largest six subjects (CSA>30 cm) from group B resulted in an appropriate fit for the CSA model. Application of the models to group A posttraining data showed that both models were appropriate, but only the body mass model was successful for group B. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the application of scaling exponents of 0.64 and 0.71, using BM and CSA, respectively, are appropriate for scaling isometric biceps strength in adult males. However, the scaling exponent using CSA may not be appropriate for individuals with biceps CSA>30 cm. Finally, 12 wk of resistance training does not alter the relationship between BM, CSA, and muscular strength as assessed by allometric scaling.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were 1) derive allometric scaling models of isometric biceps muscle strength using pretraining body mass (BM) and muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) as scaling variables in adult males, 2) test model appropriateness using regression diagnostics, and 3) cross-validate the models before and after 12 wk of resistance training. METHODS: A subset of FAMuSS (Functional SNP Associated with Muscle Size and Strength) study data (N=136) were randomly split into two groups (A and B). Allometric scaling models using pretraining BM and CSA were derived and tested for group A. The scaling exponents determined from these models were then applied to and tested on group B pretraining data. Finally, these scaling exponents were applied to and tested on group A and B posttraining data. RESULTS: BM and CSA models produced scaling exponents of 0.64 and 0.71, respectively. Regression diagnostics determined both models to be appropriate. Cross-validation of the models to group B showed that the BM model, but not the CSA model, was appropriate. Removal of the largest six subjects (CSA>30 cm) from group B resulted in an appropriate fit for the CSA model. Application of the models to group A posttraining data showed that both models were appropriate, but only the body mass model was successful for group B. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the application of scaling exponents of 0.64 and 0.71, using BM and CSA, respectively, are appropriate for scaling isometric biceps strength in adult males. However, the scaling exponent using CSA may not be appropriate for individuals with biceps CSA>30 cm. Finally, 12 wk of resistance training does not alter the relationship between BM, CSA, and muscular strength as assessed by allometric scaling.
Authors: Robert F Zoeller; Eric D Ryan; Heather Gordish-Dressman; Thomas B Price; Richard L Seip; Theodore J Angelopoulos; Niall M Moyna; Paul M Gordon; Paul D Thompson; Eric P Hoffman Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2008-07-22 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Joseph M Devaney; Heather Gordish-Dressman; Brennan T Harmon; Margaret K Bradbury; Stephanie A Devaney; Tamara B Harris; Paul D Thompson; Priscilla M Clarkson; Thomas B Price; Theodore J Angelopoulos; Paul M Gordon; Niall M Moyna; Linda S Pesca; Paul S VIsich; Robert F Zoeller; Richard L Seip; Jinwook Seo; Bo Hyoung Kim; Laura L Tosi; Melissa Garcia; Rongling Li; Joseph M Zmuda; Matthew J Delmonico; Robert S Lindsay; Barbara V Howard; William E Kraus; Eric P Hoffman Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Cesar C C Abad; Ronaldo V Barros; Romulo Bertuzzi; João F L Gagliardi; Adriano E Lima-Silva; Mike I Lambert; Flavio O Pires Journal: J Hum Kinet Date: 2016-07-02 Impact factor: 2.193
Authors: Peter N Chalmers; Spencer R Lindsay; Weston Smith; Jun Kawakami; Ryan Hill; Robert Z Tashjian; Jay D Keener Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2020-07-23 Impact factor: 3.019