Literature DB >> 17545893

Allometric scaling of biceps strength before and after resistance training in men.

Robert F Zoeller1, Eric D Ryan, Heather Gordish-Dressman, Thomas B Price, Richard L Seip, Theodore J Angelopoulos, Niall M Moyna, Paul M Gordon, Paul D Thompson, Eric P Hoffman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were 1) derive allometric scaling models of isometric biceps muscle strength using pretraining body mass (BM) and muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) as scaling variables in adult males, 2) test model appropriateness using regression diagnostics, and 3) cross-validate the models before and after 12 wk of resistance training.
METHODS: A subset of FAMuSS (Functional SNP Associated with Muscle Size and Strength) study data (N=136) were randomly split into two groups (A and B). Allometric scaling models using pretraining BM and CSA were derived and tested for group A. The scaling exponents determined from these models were then applied to and tested on group B pretraining data. Finally, these scaling exponents were applied to and tested on group A and B posttraining data.
RESULTS: BM and CSA models produced scaling exponents of 0.64 and 0.71, respectively. Regression diagnostics determined both models to be appropriate. Cross-validation of the models to group B showed that the BM model, but not the CSA model, was appropriate. Removal of the largest six subjects (CSA>30 cm) from group B resulted in an appropriate fit for the CSA model. Application of the models to group A posttraining data showed that both models were appropriate, but only the body mass model was successful for group B.
CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the application of scaling exponents of 0.64 and 0.71, using BM and CSA, respectively, are appropriate for scaling isometric biceps strength in adult males. However, the scaling exponent using CSA may not be appropriate for individuals with biceps CSA>30 cm. Finally, 12 wk of resistance training does not alter the relationship between BM, CSA, and muscular strength as assessed by allometric scaling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17545893     DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180423aad

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  4 in total

1.  Allometric scaling of isometric biceps strength in adult females and the effect of body mass index.

Authors:  Robert F Zoeller; Eric D Ryan; Heather Gordish-Dressman; Thomas B Price; Richard L Seip; Theodore J Angelopoulos; Niall M Moyna; Paul M Gordon; Paul D Thompson; Eric P Hoffman
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  AKT1 polymorphisms are associated with risk for metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Joseph M Devaney; Heather Gordish-Dressman; Brennan T Harmon; Margaret K Bradbury; Stephanie A Devaney; Tamara B Harris; Paul D Thompson; Priscilla M Clarkson; Thomas B Price; Theodore J Angelopoulos; Paul M Gordon; Niall M Moyna; Linda S Pesca; Paul S VIsich; Robert F Zoeller; Richard L Seip; Jinwook Seo; Bo Hyoung Kim; Laura L Tosi; Melissa Garcia; Rongling Li; Joseph M Zmuda; Matthew J Delmonico; Robert S Lindsay; Barbara V Howard; William E Kraus; Eric P Hoffman
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  10 km running performance predicted by a multiple linear regression model with allometrically adjusted variables.

Authors:  Cesar C C Abad; Ronaldo V Barros; Romulo Bertuzzi; João F L Gagliardi; Adriano E Lima-Silva; Mike I Lambert; Flavio O Pires
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2016-07-02       Impact factor: 2.193

4.  Infraspinatus and deltoid length and patient height: implications for lateralization and distalization in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Spencer R Lindsay; Weston Smith; Jun Kawakami; Ryan Hill; Robert Z Tashjian; Jay D Keener
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.019

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.