Literature DB >> 17545443

Training resources in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Mark A Vitale1, Conor P Kleweno, Alberto M Jacir, William N Levine, Louis U Bigliani, Christopher S Ahmad.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: All-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is becoming more commonly performed with recent improvements in implants, instrumentation, and techniques. This study evaluated the influence of different training resources for surgeons performing this procedure.
METHODS: A twenty-eight-item survey was created to evaluate the methods by which orthopaedic surgeons are trained in the skill of all-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. We selected 2455 surgeons from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons web site who indicated that they performed shoulder surgery, arthroscopic surgery, and/or sports medicine as part of their practice. Using a 5-point Likert scale, the respondents rated the relative importance of different training resources, including the completion of a sports medicine or shoulder surgery fellowship, attendance at instructional courses, and practice on shoulder models, in contributing to their ability to perform arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
RESULTS: Of the 2455 surveys sent, 1076 were returned (a response rate of 43.8%). Significantly more surgeons indicated that they performed arthroscopic repairs for a 2-cm tear compared with a 5-cm tear (p < 0.001). A younger age, higher volume of shoulder arthroscopies, and higher volume of rotator cuff repairs were all associated with significantly higher rates of preference for all-arthroscopic repairs compared with other types of repairs (p < 0.001). Compared with surgeons who received training in shoulder surgery during residency only, surgeons who had completed either shoulder or sports medicine fellowships were more likely to perform all-arthroscopic repairs. When ranking the relative importance of resources in the training for all-arthroscopic repair, the overall Likert scale scores were highest for a sports medicine fellowship (3.49), hands-on instructional courses (3.33), and practice in an arthroscopy laboratory on cadaver specimens (3.22). Likert scores were lowest for residency training (2.02), practice on artificial shoulder models (2.13), and Internet resources (2.25).
CONCLUSION: The information from this survey may be used to direct the continually evolving training of surgeons in arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17545443     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  7 in total

1.  How orthopaedic residents perceive educational resources.

Authors:  Brian R Wolf; Carla L Britton
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2013

2.  The measurement of bone mineral density of bilateral proximal humeri using DXA in patients with unilateral rotator cuff tear.

Authors:  J H Oh; B W Song; S H Kim; J-A Choi; J W Lee; S W Chung; T-Y Rhie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  National trends in rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Alexis Chiang Colvin; Natalia Egorova; Alicia K Harrison; Alan Moskowitz; Evan L Flatow
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Shoulder Arthroscopy Simulator Training Improves Surgical Procedure Performance: A Controlled Laboratory Study.

Authors:  Jordan Hauschild; Jessica C Rivera; Anthony E Johnson; Travis C Burns; Christopher J Roach
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-05-10

5.  Use and Effectiveness of the Cadaver-Lab in Orthopaedic and Traumatology Education: An Italian Survey.

Authors:  Michele Losco; Filippo Familiari; Francesco Giron; Rocco Papalia
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2017-12-11

6.  Arthroscopic Versus Open Rotator Cuff Repair: Fellowship-Trained Orthopaedic Surgeons Prefer Arthroscopy and Self-Report a Lower Complication Rate.

Authors:  Blane C Kelly; David S Constantinescu; William Pavlis; Alexander R Vap
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-10-13

7.  Arthroscopic proficiency: methods in evaluating competency.

Authors:  Justin L Hodgins; Christian Veillette
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.463

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.