Literature DB >> 17544877

Comparison of the interobserver reproducibility with different histologic criteria used in celiac disease.

Gino Roberto Corazza1, Vincenzo Villanacci, Claudia Zambelli, Massimo Milione, Ombretta Luinetti, Carla Vindigni, Caterina Chioda, Luca Albarello, Daniela Bartolini, Francesco Donato.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The Marsh-Oberhuber classification of duodenojejunal mucosal lesions is currently used for celiac disease. A more simplified classification, which is based on 3 villous morphologies (A, non-atrophic; B1, atrophic, villous-crypt ratio <3:1; B2, atrophic, villi no longer detectable) and an intraepithelial lymphocyte count of >25/100 enterocytes, has recently been proposed. The aim of the study was to asses the interobserver agreement between different pathologists in classifying celiac disease lesions according to both Marsh-Oberhuber and the new classification system.
METHODS: Sixty patients were selected for the study: 10 subjects without celiac disease, 13 celiac patients with normal villi but a pathologic increase in intraepithelial lymphocytes >25/100 and hyperplastic crypts, and 37 patients with celiac disease with villous atrophy. Sixty slides were sent to 6 pathologists, who were blinded to each other and were not given any clinical information. Each pathologist received the set of biopsy specimens on 2 separate occasions and had to evaluate them according to both grading systems in a random order. The kappa statistic was used to assess agreement between each pair of pathologists.
RESULTS: Overall, mean kappa values were 0.35 (fair) for the Marsh-Oberhuber classification versus 0.55 (moderate) for the new classification system.
CONCLUSIONS: The new classification for duodenal pathology in celiac disease gives better interobserver agreement compared with the more cumbersome Marsh-Oberhuber classification and contributes to the validity of diagnosis in celiac disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17544877     DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.03.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  69 in total

Review 1.  Celiac disease: diagnostic criteria in progress.

Authors:  U Volta; V Villanacci
Journal:  Cell Mol Immunol       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 11.530

Review 2.  Pearls and pitfalls in the diagnosis of adult celiac disease.

Authors:  H J Freeman
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.522

3.  Recent advances in celiac disease.

Authors:  Hugh James Freeman; Angeli Chopra; Michael Tom Clandinin; Alan Br Thomson
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Microscopic enteritis: Bucharest consensus.

Authors:  Kamran Rostami; David Aldulaimi; Geoffrey Holmes; Matt W Johnson; Marie Robert; Amitabh Srivastava; Jean-François Fléjou; David S Sanders; Umberto Volta; Mohammad H Derakhshan; James J Going; Gabriel Becheanu; Carlo Catassi; Mihai Danciu; Luke Materacki; Kamran Ghafarzadegan; Sauid Ishaq; Mohammad Rostami-Nejad; A Salvador Peña; Gabrio Bassotti; Michael N Marsh; Vincenzo Villanacci
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Diagnosing celiac disease: A critical overview.

Authors:  Arzu Ensari; Michael N Marsh
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.852

6.  Is hyperhomocysteinemia relevant in patients with celiac disease?

Authors:  Giovanni Casella; Gabrio Bassotti; Vincenzo Villanacci; Camillo Di Bella; Fabio Pagni; Gian Luigi Corti; Giuseppe Sabatino; Mara Piatti; Vittorio Baldini
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Celiac disease: prevalence, diagnosis, pathogenesis and treatment.

Authors:  Naiyana Gujral; Hugh J Freeman; Alan B R Thomson
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  [Histological diagnosis and complications of celiac disease. Update according to the new S2k guidelines].

Authors:  D E Aust; H Bläker
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.011

9.  Influence of previously ingested wheat on fasting breath hydrogen in celiac patients.

Authors:  S V Rana; S Sharma; S K Sinha; J Kaur; K K Prasad; K Singh
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Adult celiac disease and its malignant complications.

Authors:  Hugh J Freeman
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 4.519

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.