BACKGROUND: With increased focus on improving surgical care quality, understanding structures and processes that influence surgical care is timely and important, as is more precise specification of these through improved measurement. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a qualitative study to help design a quantitative survey of structures and processes of surgical care. We audiotaped 44 face-to-face interviews with surgical care leaders and other diverse members of the surgical care team from 6 hospitals (two Veterans Affairs, four private sector). Qualitative interviews were transcribed and analyzed to identify common structures and processes mentioned by interviewees to include on a quantitative survey and to develop a rich description of salient themes on indicators of effective surgical care services and surgical care teams. RESULTS: Qualitative analyses of transcripts resulted in detailed descriptions of structures and processes of surgical care services that affected surgical care team performance--and how particular structures led to effective and ineffective processes that impacted quality and outcomes of surgical care. Communication and care coordination were most frequently mentioned as essential to effective surgical care services and teams. Informants also described other influences on surgical quality and outcomes, such as staffing, the role of residents, and team composition and continuity. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical care team members reinforced the importance of understanding surgical care processes and structures to improve both quality and outcomes of surgical care. The analysis of interviews helped the study team identify potential measures of structures and processes to include in our quantitative survey.
BACKGROUND: With increased focus on improving surgical care quality, understanding structures and processes that influence surgical care is timely and important, as is more precise specification of these through improved measurement. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a qualitative study to help design a quantitative survey of structures and processes of surgical care. We audiotaped 44 face-to-face interviews with surgical care leaders and other diverse members of the surgical care team from 6 hospitals (two Veterans Affairs, four private sector). Qualitative interviews were transcribed and analyzed to identify common structures and processes mentioned by interviewees to include on a quantitative survey and to develop a rich description of salient themes on indicators of effective surgical care services and surgical care teams. RESULTS: Qualitative analyses of transcripts resulted in detailed descriptions of structures and processes of surgical care services that affected surgical care team performance--and how particular structures led to effective and ineffective processes that impacted quality and outcomes of surgical care. Communication and care coordination were most frequently mentioned as essential to effective surgical care services and teams. Informants also described other influences on surgical quality and outcomes, such as staffing, the role of residents, and team composition and continuity. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical care team members reinforced the importance of understanding surgical care processes and structures to improve both quality and outcomes of surgical care. The analysis of interviews helped the study team identify potential measures of structures and processes to include in our quantitative survey.
Authors: Andrew A Gonzalez; Micah E Girotti; Terry Shih; Thomas W Wakefield; Justin B Dimick Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2014-03-12 Impact factor: 4.268