Literature DB >> 17544014

The neural basis of temporal preparation: Insights from brain tumor patients.

Antonino Vallesi1, Alessandro Mussoni, Massimo Mondani, Riccardo Budai, Miran Skrap, Tim Shallice.   

Abstract

When foreperiods (FPs) of different duration vary on a trial-by-trial basis equiprobably but randomly, the RT is faster as the FP increases (variable FP effect), and becomes slower as the FP on the preceding trial gets longer (sequential effects). It is unclear whether the two effects are due to a common mechanism or to two different ones. Patients with lesions on the right lateral prefrontal cortex do not show the typical FP effect, suggesting a deficit in monitoring the FP adequately [Stuss, D. T., Alexander, M. P., Shallice, T., Picton, T. W., Binns, M. A., Macdonald, R., et al. (2005). Multiple frontal systems controlling response speed. Neuropsychologia, 43, 396-417]. The aim of this study was two-fold: (1) to replicate this neuropsychological result testing cerebral tumor patients before and after surgical removal of the tumor located unilaterally in the prefrontal, premotor or parietal cortex, respectively and (2) to investigate whether the sequential effects would change together with the FP effect (supporting single-process accounts) or the two effects can be dissociated across tumor locations (suggesting dual-process views). The results of an experiment with a variable FP paradigm show a significant reduction of the FP effect selectively after excision of tumors on right prefrontal cortex. On the other hand, the sequential effects were reliably reduced especially after surgical removal of tumors located in the left premotor region, despite a normal FP effect. The latter dissociation between the two effects supports a dual-process account of the variable FP phenomena. This study demonstrates that testing acute cerebral tumor patients represents a viable neuropsychological approach for the fractionation and localisation of cognitive processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17544014     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  21 in total

Review 1.  Neuroanatomical and neurochemical substrates of timing.

Authors:  Jennifer T Coull; Ruey-Kuang Cheng; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Prefrontal D1 dopamine signaling is necessary for temporal expectation during reaction time performance.

Authors:  K L Parker; S L Alberico; A D Miller; N S Narayanan
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Neural substrates of mounting temporal expectation.

Authors:  Jennifer T Coull
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 8.029

4.  Increased Automaticity and Altered Temporal Preparation Following Sleep Deprivation.

Authors:  Danyang Kong; Christopher L Asplund; Aiqing Ling; Michael W L Chee
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 5.849

5.  The expected oddball: effects of implicit and explicit positional expectation on duration perception.

Authors:  Jordan J Wehrman; John Wearden; Paul Sowman
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-09-12

6.  Right-lateralized intrinsic brain dynamics predict monitoring abilities.

Authors:  Ettore Ambrosini; Mariagrazia Capizzi; Sandra Arbula; Antonino Vallesi
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Semantic access dysphasia resulting from left temporal lobe tumours.

Authors:  Fabio Campanella; Massimo Mondani; Miran Skrap; Tim Shallice
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Brain activation and functional connectivity in premanifest Huntington's disease during states of intrinsic and phasic alertness.

Authors:  Robert Christian Wolf; Georg Grön; Fabio Sambataro; Nenad Vasic; Nadine Donata Wolf; Philipp Arthur Thomann; Carsten Saft; G Bernhard Landwehrmeyer; Michael Orth
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Interacting outcome retrieval, anticipation, and feedback processes in the human brain.

Authors:  Nicholas D Walsh; Mary L Phillips
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Ready...go: Amplitude of the FMRI signal encodes expectation of cue arrival time.

Authors:  Xu Cui; Chess Stetson; P Read Montague; David M Eagleman
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.