Literature DB >> 17541747

Cell loss in integrated microfluidic device.

Liang Zhu1, Xue Li Peh, Hong Miao Ji, Cheng Yong Teo, Han Hua Feng, Wen-Tso Liu.   

Abstract

Cell loss during sample transporting from macro-components to micro-components in integrated microfluidic devices can considerably deteriorate cell detection sensitivity. This intrinsic cell loss was studied and effectively minimized through (a) increasing the tubing diameter connecting the sample storage and the micro-device, (b) applying a hydrodynamic focusing approach for sample delivering to reduce cells contacting and adhesion on the walls of micro-channel and chip inlet; (c) optimizing the filter design with a zigzag arrangement of pillars (13 microm in chamber depth and 0.8 microm in gap) to prolong the effective filter length, and iv) the use of diamond shaped pillar instead of normally used rectangular shape to reduce the gap length between any two given pillar (i.e. pressure drop) at the filter region. Cell trapping and immunofluorescent detection of 12 Giardia lamblia and 12 Cryptosporidium parvum cells in 150 microl solution and 50 MCF-7 breast cancer cells in 150 microl solution was completed within 15 min with trapping efficiencies improved from 79+/-11%, 50.8+/-5.5% and 41.3+/-3.6% without hydrodynamic focusing, respectively, to 90.8+/-5.8%, 89.8+/-16.6% and 77.0+/-9.2% with hydrodynamic focusing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17541747     DOI: 10.1007/s10544-007-9085-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Microdevices        ISSN: 1387-2176            Impact factor:   2.838


  5 in total

1.  Macroporous hydrogel micropillars for quantifying Met kinase activity in cancer cell lysates.

Authors:  Alicia D Powers; Bi Liu; Andrew G Lee; Sean P Palecek
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 4.616

2.  Comparison of inlet geometry in microfluidic cell affinity chromatography.

Authors:  Peng Li; Yu Tian; Dimitri Pappas
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 3.  Microfluidic systems for hydrodynamic trapping of cells and clusters.

Authors:  Qiyue Luan; Celine Macaraniag; Jian Zhou; Ian Papautsky
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.800

4.  Microfluidic high-throughput encapsulation and hydrodynamic self-sorting of single cells.

Authors:  Max Chabert; Jean-Louis Viovy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Comparison of Chip Inlet Geometry in Microfluidic Devices for Cell Studies.

Authors:  Yung-Shin Sun
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 4.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.