| Literature DB >> 17541464 |
A C S Machado1, E M B Guimarães, E Sakurai, F C R Fioravante, W N Amaral, M F C Alves.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate serum chlamydia antibody titers (CATs) in tubal occlusion or previous ectopic pregnancy and the associated risk factors.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17541464 PMCID: PMC1874668 DOI: 10.1155/2007/24816
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol ISSN: 1064-7449
Sociodemographic characteristics and sexual behavior of 55 women with tubal occlusion or previous ectopic pregnancy (group I) and 55 parous women (group II), from Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil, in 2001.
| Variable | Group I n (%) | Group II n (%) |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Married/cohabiting | 48 (87.3%) | 45 (81.8%) |
| Single | 07 (12.7%) | 10 (18.2%) |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| <5 | — | 02 (3.6%) |
| 5–8 | 05 (9.1%) | 11 (20.0%) |
| 9–11 | 25 (45.5%) | 29 (52.7%) |
| >11 | 25 (45.5%) | 13 (23.6%) |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| ≤15 | 07 (12.7%) | 11 (20.0%) |
| >15 | 48 (87.3%) | 44 (80.0%) |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| 1 | 20 (36.4%) | 22 (40.0%) |
| 2–3 | 18 (32.7%) | 22 (40.0%) |
| ≥4 | 17 (30.9%) | 11 (20.0%) |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Yes | 04 (7.3%) | 04 (7.3%) |
| No | 51 (92.7%) | 51 (92.7%) |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Yes | 04 (7.3%) | 02 (4.4%) |
| No | 44 (91.7%) | 43 (95.6%) |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Yes | 09 (16.4%) | — |
| No | 46 (83.6%) | 55 (100.0%) |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Yes | 05 (10.4%) | 03 (6.7%) |
| No | 43 (89.6%) | 42 (93.3%) |
*These items were only replied to by women married or in consensual union.
Figure 1Frequency ofC. trachomatis antibody titers in women with tubal damage and in parous women.
Univariate analysis of the characteristics associated with the presence of chlamydia IgG antibodies in women with tubal occlusion or previous ectopic pregnancy (group I, n = 55) and in parous women (group II, n = 55), in Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil, in 2001.
| Variable | Group I IgG+ | OR | IC 95% | Group II IgG+ | OR | IC 95% |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| ≤30 | 18 (58.1%) | 2.31 | (0.7–8.0) | 05 (29.4%) | 2.75 | (0.5–13.9) |
| >30 | 13 (41.9%) | 12 (70.6%) | ||||
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Married/cohabiting | 06 (19.4%) | 14 (82.4%) | ||||
| Single | 25 (80.6%) | 5.52 | (0.6–131.2) | 03 (17.6%) | 1.05 | (0.2–6.1) |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| ≤8 | 04 (12.9%) | 3.41 | (0.3–86.0) | 03 (17.6%) | 0.60 | (0.1–2.9) |
| >8 | 27 (87.1%) | 14 (82.4%) | ||||
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| ≥4 | 14 (45.2%) | 18.67 | (2.9–150.1) | 06 (35.3%) | 4.08 | (0.7–26.3) |
| 2 or 3 | 13 (41.9%) | 10.40 | (1.9–65.2) | 06 (35.3%) | 1.27 | (0.3–6.2) |
| 1 | 04 (12.9%) | 05 (29.4%) | ||||
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| ≤15 | 06 (19.4%) | 5.52 | (0.6–131.2) | 04 (23.5%) | 1.36 | (0.3–6.6) |
| >15 | 25 (80.6%) | 13 (76.5%) | ||||
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Yes | 03 (9.7%) | 2.46 | (0.2–65.9) | 03 (17.6%) | 7.93 | (0.6–216.4) |
| No | 28 (90.3%) | 14 (82.4%) | ||||
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Yes | 02 (8.0%) | 0.91 | (0.1–10.2) | 01 (7.1%) | 2.31 | (0.0–93.2) |
| No | 23 (92.0) | 13 (92.6%) | ||||
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Yes | 08 (25.8%) | 8.00 | (0.9–184.5) | |||
| No | 23 (74.2%) | |||||
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Yes | 03 (12.0%) | 1.43 | (0.2–13.9) | 01 (7.1%) | 1.12 | (0.0–18.2) |
| No | 22 (88.0%) | 13 (92.9%) | ||||
* P < .05.