Literature DB >> 17540969

Gender differences in outcomes among patients with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis.

Janice E Williams1, Marc I Chimowitz, George A Cotsonis, Michael J Lynn, Salina P Waddy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: There are limited and conflicting data on gender differences in clinical outcomes among patients with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. This study examined gender differences in patients enrolled in the Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease (WASID) Study.
METHODS: Participants were 569 men and women with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. They were followed-up for the occurrence of ischemic stroke and the combined end point of stroke or vascular death from February 1999 through July 2003 (mean follow-up, 1.8 years).
RESULTS: Two-year rates of the primary end point were 28.4% and 16.6% for women and men, respectively. Cumulative probabilities of the outcomes over time were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method and were compared between men and women with the use of the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to estimate the hazard ratio of gender (women to men) for ischemic stroke and for the primary end point. The probabilities of ischemic stroke (P=0.005) and of the combined end point of stroke or vascular death (P=0.017) over time were significantly higher in women than men. Women had a greater multivariate-adjusted risk for ischemic stroke (HR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.14 to 3.01; P=0.013) and for the combined end point of stroke or vascular death (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.48; P=0.045).
CONCLUSIONS: Women with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis are at significantly greater risk for ischemic stroke and for the combined end point of stroke or vascular death. These findings suggest the need for vigorous screening of risk factors and for aggressive management of risk factors and stroke in women. They also suggest the need to ensure adequate numbers of women in clinical trials designed to explore new and promising therapies for intracranial arterial stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17540969     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.482240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  18 in total

1.  Differential Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-A165 Isoforms Between Intracranial Atherosclerosis and Moyamoya Disease.

Authors:  Hao Jiang; Juan F Toscano; Michael Schiraldi; Shlee S Song; Konrad H Schlick; Oana M Dumitrascu; Raymond Liou; Patrick D Lyden; Jianwei Pan; Renya Zhan; Jeffrey L Saver; Nestor R Gonzalez
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 2.136

2.  Effect of sex on outcome after recurrent stroke in African Americans: results from the African American Antiplatelet Stroke Prevention Study.

Authors:  Fernando D Testai; John F Cursio; Philip B Gorelick
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.136

Review 3.  Intracranial stenting in atherosclerotic disease-recent results and challenges to face.

Authors:  Wiebke Kurre; René Chapot; Richard du Mesnil de Rochemont; Joachim Berkefeld
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 4.  Stenting in Intracranial Stenosis: Current Controversies and Future Directions.

Authors:  Arindam R Chatterjee; Colin P Derdeyn
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.113

5.  Indirect revascularization for nonmoyamoya intracranial arterial stenoses: clinical and angiographic outcomes.

Authors:  Joshua R Dusick; David S Liebeskind; Jeffrey L Saver; Neil A Martin; Nestor R Gonzalez
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Differences in stroke outcome based on sex.

Authors:  N Shobha; P N Sylaja; M K Kapral; J Fang; M D Hill
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 7.  Intracranial arterial stenoses: current viewpoints, novel approaches, and surgical perspectives.

Authors:  Nestor R Gonzalez; David S Liebeskind; Joshua R Dusick; Fernando Mayor; Jeffrey Saver
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 8.  Stroke treatment and prevention are not the same in men and women.

Authors:  Helmi L Lutsep
Journal:  Medscape J Med       Date:  2008-02-01

9.  Perception of risk and knowledge of risk factors in women at high risk for stroke.

Authors:  Jennifer L Dearborn; Louise D McCullough
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Effect of lipid-lowering therapy on the progression of intracranial arterial stenosis.

Authors:  Teng-Yeow Tan; Yeh-Lin Kuo; Wei-Che Lin; Ting-Yao Chen
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.