BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Women face a higher mortality after stroke and have different risk factors than men. Despite educational campaigns, women continue to underestimate their own risk for stroke. We present a theoretical model to understand risk perception in high-risk women. METHODS: Eight hundred five women, ages 50 to 70 years, were selected from the University of Connecticut Cardiology Center with at least one risk factor for stroke. A 5-part questionnaire addressed stroke knowledge, risk perception, risk factors, access to health care, and demographics. Two hundred fifteen women responded by mail (28% response rate) and deidentified data were entered in SPSS. Descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate techniques assessed the proposed model. RESULTS: The cohort was predominantly white (91.5%), higher income (33.1% of the population earned >$75,000), and well-educated (28.6% attended graduate or professional school). Only 2 of the 37 (5.4%) women with atrial fibrillation and 11 of the 71 women with heart disease (15.5%) identified their health condition as a risk factor for stroke. Predictors of risk perception included: other women's risk (B=0.336, P<0.001), worrying about stroke (B=0.734, P<0.001), having hypertension (B=0.686, P=0.037), and having diabetes (B=0.893, P=0.004). Only 63.9% of women with atrial fibrillation (n=23) reported taking warfarin. CONCLUSIONS: Women were often unable to identify their health condition as a risk factor for stroke. In addition, many women were not undertaking primary prevention behaviors. Risk perception was low, and high-risk women perceived their risk of stroke to be the same as their peers. Educational strategies must advocate for and target high-risk women.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Women face a higher mortality after stroke and have different risk factors than men. Despite educational campaigns, women continue to underestimate their own risk for stroke. We present a theoretical model to understand risk perception in high-risk women. METHODS: Eight hundred five women, ages 50 to 70 years, were selected from the University of Connecticut Cardiology Center with at least one risk factor for stroke. A 5-part questionnaire addressed stroke knowledge, risk perception, risk factors, access to health care, and demographics. Two hundred fifteen women responded by mail (28% response rate) and deidentified data were entered in SPSS. Descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate techniques assessed the proposed model. RESULTS: The cohort was predominantly white (91.5%), higher income (33.1% of the population earned >$75,000), and well-educated (28.6% attended graduate or professional school). Only 2 of the 37 (5.4%) women with atrial fibrillation and 11 of the 71 women with heart disease (15.5%) identified their health condition as a risk factor for stroke. Predictors of risk perception included: other women's risk (B=0.336, P<0.001), worrying about stroke (B=0.734, P<0.001), having hypertension (B=0.686, P=0.037), and having diabetes (B=0.893, P=0.004). Only 63.9% of women with atrial fibrillation (n=23) reported taking warfarin. CONCLUSIONS:Women were often unable to identify their health condition as a risk factor for stroke. In addition, many women were not undertaking primary prevention behaviors. Risk perception was low, and high-risk women perceived their risk of stroke to be the same as their peers. Educational strategies must advocate for and target high-risk women.
Authors: Margaret C Fang; Daniel E Singer; Yuchiao Chang; Elaine M Hylek; Lori E Henault; Nancy G Jensvold; Alan S Go Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-09-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sudha Seshadri; Alexa Beiser; Margaret Kelly-Hayes; Carlos S Kase; Rhoda Au; William B Kannel; Philip A Wolf Journal: Stroke Date: 2006-01-05 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: A M Pancioli; J Broderick; R Kothari; T Brott; A Tuchfarber; R Miller; J Khoury; E Jauch Journal: JAMA Date: 1998 Apr 22-29 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Kathryn L Taylor; Rebecca A Shelby; Marc D Schwartz; Josh Ackerman; V Holland LaSalle; Edward P Gelmann; Colleen McGuire Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Alexander T Schneider; Arthur M Pancioli; Jane C Khoury; Eric Rademacher; Alfred Tuchfarber; Rosemary Miller; Daniel Woo; Brett Kissela; Joseph P Broderick Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-01-15 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: David J Gladstone; Esther Bui; Jiming Fang; Andreas Laupacis; M Patrice Lindsay; Jack V Tu; Frank L Silver; Moira K Kapral Journal: Stroke Date: 2008-08-28 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Marcos Daccarett; Troy J Badger; Nazem Akoum; Nathan S Burgon; Christian Mahnkopf; Gaston Vergara; Eugene Kholmovski; Christopher J McGann; Dennis Parker; Johannes Brachmann; Rob S Macleod; Nassir F Marrouche Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2011-02-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Figen Gokcay; Ethem Murat Arsava; Tuna Baykaner; Mark Vangel; Priya Garg; Ona Wu; Aneesh B Singhal; Karen L Furie; A Gregory Sorensen; Hakan Ay Journal: Stroke Date: 2011-02-10 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Etienne Aliot; Günter Breithardt; Josep Brugada; John Camm; Gregory Y H Lip; Panos E Vardas; Markus Wagner Journal: Europace Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Dawn M Aycock; Kenya D Kirkendoll; Kisha C Coleman; Patricia C Clark; Karen C Albright; Anne W Alexandrov Journal: J Cardiovasc Nurs Date: 2015 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.083