Literature DB >> 17540281

Performance of blind source separation algorithms for fMRI analysis using a group ICA method.

Nicolle Correa1, Tülay Adali, Vince D Calhoun.   

Abstract

Independent component analysis (ICA) is a popular blind source separation technique that has proven to be promising for the analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. A number of ICA approaches have been used for fMRI data analysis, and even more ICA algorithms exist; however, the impact of using different algorithms on the results is largely unexplored. In this paper, we study the performance of four major classes of algorithms for spatial ICA, namely, information maximization, maximization of non-Gaussianity, joint diagonalization of cross-cumulant matrices and second-order correlation-based methods, when they are applied to fMRI data from subjects performing a visuo-motor task. We use a group ICA method to study variability among different ICA algorithms, and we propose several analysis techniques to evaluate their performance. We compare how different ICA algorithms estimate activations in expected neuronal areas. The results demonstrate that the ICA algorithms using higher-order statistical information prove to be quite consistent for fMRI data analysis. Infomax, FastICA and joint approximate diagonalization of eigenmatrices (JADE) all yield reliable results, with each having its strengths in specific areas. Eigenvalue decomposition (EVD), an algorithm using second-order statistics, does not perform reliably for fMRI data. Additionally, for iterative ICA algorithms, it is important to investigate the variability of estimates from different runs. We test the consistency of the iterative algorithms Infomax and FastICA by running the algorithm a number of times with different initializations, and we note that they yield consistent results over these multiple runs. Our results greatly improve our confidence in the consistency of ICA for fMRI data analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17540281      PMCID: PMC2358930          DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2006.10.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  24 in total

1.  Motion correction algorithms may create spurious brain activations in the absence of subject motion.

Authors:  L Freire; J F Mangin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  What is the best similarity measure for motion correction in fMRI time series?

Authors:  L Freire; A Roche; J F Mangin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets.

Authors:  Joseph A Maldjian; Paul J Laurienti; Robert A Kraft; Jonathan H Burdette
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Validating the independent components of neuroimaging time series via clustering and visualization.

Authors:  Johan Himberg; Aapo Hyvärinen; Fabrizio Esposito
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Comparison of three methods for generating group statistical inferences from independent component analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data.

Authors:  Vincent J Schmithorst; Scott K Holland
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Separation of a mixture of independent signals using time delayed correlations.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1994-06-06       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  Tensorial extensions of independent component analysis for multisubject FMRI analysis.

Authors:  C F Beckmann; S M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-01-08       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Unified SPM-ICA for fMRI analysis.

Authors:  Dewen Hu; Lirong Yan; Yadong Liu; Zongtan Zhou; Karl J Friston; Changlian Tan; Daxing Wu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components.

Authors:  M J McKeown; S Makeig; G G Brown; T P Jung; S S Kindermann; A J Bell; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution.

Authors:  A J Bell; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.026

View more
  72 in total

1.  Group ICA of resting-state data: a comparison.

Authors:  Veronika Schöpf; Christian Windischberger; Christian H Kasess; Rupert Lanzenberger; Ewald Moser
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Mapping rabbit whisker barrels using discriminant analysis of high field fMRI data.

Authors:  Xiaomu Song; Limin Li; Daniil Aksenov; Michael J Miller; Alice M Wyrwicz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Higher-order contrast functions improve performance of independent component analysis of fMRI data.

Authors:  Vincent J Schmithorst
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Blind identification of evoked human brain activity with independent component analysis of optical data.

Authors:  Joanne Markham; Brian R White; Benjamin W Zeff; Joseph P Culver
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  A review of feature reduction techniques in neuroimaging.

Authors:  Benson Mwangi; Tian Siva Tian; Jair C Soares
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2014-04

6.  Resting state networks in human cervical spinal cord observed with fMRI.

Authors:  Pengxu Wei; Jianjun Li; Feng Gao; Derong Ye; Qin Zhong; Shujia Liu
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Unbiased group-level statistical assessment of independent component maps by means of automated retrospective matching.

Authors:  Dave R M Langers
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Resting-state networks in awake five- to eight-year old children.

Authors:  Henrica M A de Bie; Maria Boersma; Sofie Adriaanse; Dick J Veltman; Alle Meije Wink; Stefan D Roosendaal; Frederik Barkhof; Cornelis J Stam; Kim J Oostrom; Henriette A Delemarre-van de Waal; Ernesto J Sanz-Arigita
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Omission of temporal nuisance regressors from dual regression can improve accuracy of fMRI functional connectivity maps.

Authors:  Robert E Kelly; Matthew J Hoptman; George S Alexopoulos; Faith M Gunning; Martin J McKeown
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Incentives facilitate developmental improvement in inhibitory control by modulating control-related networks.

Authors:  Michael N Hallquist; Charles F Geier; Beatriz Luna
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.