Literature DB >> 17538349

Timing of paired points and surface matching registration in three-dimensional (3D) image-guided spinal surgery.

Eric W Nottmeier1, Tracey L Crosby.   

Abstract

Image-guidance can increase the safety and accuracy of spinal instrumentation placement. However, many spine surgeons are reluctant to incorporate spinal image-guidance into their surgical practice due to the perception that it is time-consuming and tedious, especially the task of vertebral registration. The authors evaluated the time required for paired points and surface matching registration when using the BrainLAB (BrainLAB, Westchester, IL) image-guided spine application for spinal surgery cases. The time required to register vertebral segments using paired points and surface matching techniques was assessed in 13 consecutive patients undergoing spinal fusions by the senior author. Overall, 23 vertebral segments were registered spanning from T1 to S1. Note was made of the vertebral segments that required reregistration due to poor accuracy. The average time required to register a single vertebral segment using the paired points and surface matching technique was 117 seconds (1 min 57 s). Average accuracy obtained was 0.9 mm. Inaccurate registration occurred in 3/23 (13%) of the segments requiring a second attempt at registration. In 3/23 (13%) of segments, adequate navigation accuracy was maintained on an adjacent vertebral segment thereby allowing for instrumentation to be placed in that adjacent segment without having to register that segment. Though associated with a learning curve, image-guidance can be used effectively and efficiently in spinal surgery. Average time required for registration of a vertebral segment using the BrainLAB spine application in this study was less than 2 minutes. The average accuracy obtained was 0.9 mm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17538349     DOI: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000211282.06519.ab

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  6 in total

1.  O-arm(®)-based spinal navigation and intraoperative 3D-imaging: first experiences.

Authors:  O Gonschorek; S Hauck; U Spiegl; T Weiß; R Pätzold; V Bühren
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  3D-based navigation in posterior stabilisations of the cervical and thoracic spine: problems and benefits. Results of 451 screws.

Authors:  J-S Jarvers; S Katscher; A Franck; S Glasmacher; C Schmidt; T Blattert; C Josten
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 3.  Image-guided spine surgery: state of the art and future directions.

Authors:  Thorsten Tjardes; Sven Shafizadeh; Dieter Rixen; Thomas Paffrath; Bertil Bouillon; Eva S Steinhausen; Holger Baethis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Accuracy and workflow of navigated spinal instrumentation with the mobile AIRO(®) CT scanner.

Authors:  Nils Hecht; Marije Kamphuis; Marcus Czabanka; Bernd Hamm; Susanne König; Johannes Woitzik; Michael Synowitz; Peter Vajkoczy
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  A photoacoustics-enhanced drilling probe for radiation-free pedicle screw implantation in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Li Liu; Yongjian Zhao; Ang Li; Xianghu Yu; Xiao Xiao; Siyu Liu; Max Q-H Meng
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-15

6.  A robot-assisted surgical system using a force-image control method for pedicle screw insertion.

Authors:  Wei Tian; Xiaoguang Han; Bo Liu; Yajun Liu; Ying Hu; Xiao Han; Yunfeng Xu; Mingxing Fan; Haiyang Jin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.